USCIRF Suggests to Blacklist India on Religious Freedom

For the second year in a row, a US commission, USCIRF, suggested that India be included on a religious freedom blacklist. The commission claimed that the treatment of minorities had worsened.

Last year, the Indian government reacted furiously to the US Commission on International Religious Freedom\’s call. However, there\’s no hope the State Department will follow its advice and condemn India.

The Dire Situation in India

In its annual report, the commission stated that “religious freedom conditions in India continued their downward trend”. However, the commission only gives recommendations and doesn\’t make policies.

The report went on to say that Prime Minister Narendra Modi\’s government \”promoted Hindu nationalist policies. This has resulted in systemic, continuing and egregious religious freedom violations.\”

It cited reports of police involvement in brutality against Muslims during deadly riots in New Delhi last year. It also highlighted the ongoing questions about a citizenship bill promoted by Modi. According to critics, the bill labels Muslims as non-Indians.

Moreover, it also claimed that the Indian government was suffocating dissent and expressed concern about the growth of interfaith marriage restrictions, especially in India\’s largest state, Uttar Pradesh.

In an apparent reference to the Tablighi Jamaat Markaz in March 2020, the USCIRF gave a statement. USCIRF stated that  “At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, disinformation and hateful rhetoric – including from government officials – often targeted religious minorities, continuing familiar patterns.”

India’s Ignorant Behaviour

Last year the USCIRF members were denied visas to visit India. The members wanted to visit for further assessment. International bodies like USCIRF, according to External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, do not have the locus standi to \”pronounce on the condition of Indian citizens\’ legally reserved rights.\”

List of Notable Names

The commission proposed that India is a \”country of special concern\” by the State Department. This is alongside China, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan.

Eritrea, Iran, Myanmar, Nigeria, North Korea, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan are among the countries on the State Department\’s blacklist, which may lead to penalties if they do not reform their records.

Moore’s Lobbying

One commissioner, Johnnie Moore, a Trump appointee, expressed reservations about the recommendation on India. Moore said in a statement that India was \”at a fork in the fence,\” nonetheless, it is still the world\’s biggest democracy, with constitutional assurances of religious freedom.

He complained that India should not be a \’country of special interest\’ among all the countries in the world. He went on to say that it personifies plurality and that its religious life has become its greatest historical blessing.

Lastly, in addition to India, the commission has requested the State Department to also include Russia, Syria and Vietnam in the blacklist.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

Since the Taliban’s return to power, Afghanistan has once again become a hub for militant activity despite their promises under the 2020 Doha Accord. UN and SIGAR reports reveal that Afghan soil now shelters TTP, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS-K operatives involved in cross-border attacks, particularly against Pakistan. The Taliban’s failure to uphold intra-Afghan dialogue, misuse of international aid, human rights abuses, and deception in regional agreements have eroded trust globally. With terror networks thriving under their protection, it is time for the U.S. and international community to adopt a new, accountable strategy toward Afghanistan’s Taliban regime.

Read More »
Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

The escalating tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban-led regime have reignited South Asia’s most volatile frontier. As cross-border attacks intensify and the Taliban refuses to dismantle the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Islamabad faces mounting security and sovereignty challenges. Yet, amid this chaos, India emerges as the silent beneficiary, leveraging regional instability to weaken Pakistan strategically while maintaining its image as a victim of terrorism. This calculated exploitation threatens to entrench South Asia in a new cycle of proxy conflict.

Read More »
Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban break commitments, harbor terrorists, exclude women and minorities, and defy international agreements.

Broken Promises, Renewed Threats: Time to Hold TTA Accountable

Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban have broken key commitments: 5,000 released prisoners returned to combat, 89% of government posts are held by Pashtuns, and women remain barred from education and work. Afghan soil hosts 6,000–6,500 TTP and Al-Qaeda fighters, with TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud receiving $43,000/month. Pakistan has neutralized 267 Afghan terrorists in 2025, while 58 terrorist camps operate under Taliban knowledge. Despite the US aid, compliance is minimal. International recognition and support must now be tied to verifiable reforms to prevent further regional instability.

Read More »
The Istanbul dialogue between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban collapsed over the TTP issue, exposing the limits of regional diplomacy and mediation.

The Istanbul Dialogue: How the Taliban’s Intransigence Doomed Diplomacy

The highly anticipated Istanbul dialogue, facilitated by Turkey and Qatar, has ended in deadlock. The Taliban’s refusal to act against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and their introduction of provocative counter-demands have effectively derailed the diplomatic process, underscoring the ideological rigidity driving Kabul’s foreign policy.

Read More »
Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s return in 2021 brought rapid consolidation of power, but also the revival of a historical flaw. By concentrating authority in the hands of southern Pashtun elites, the Taliban have recreated the core–periphery divide that has destabilized every Afghan regime since the 19th century. This hyper-centralization, rooted in ethnic exclusivity and Kandahar dominance, risks a repeat of past collapses as non-Pashtun regions turn toward functional autonomy.

Read More »