US-India Meeting on Foiled Plot to Kill Sikh Separatist Leader Deemed Productive

US and India held a productive meeting on a foiled plot to kill a Sikh separatist leader on American soil.

On Wednesday, a U.S. State Department spokesperson announced that U.S. and Indian officials had a productive meeting. During this meeting, they discussed the probe into a foiled plot to murder a Sikh separatist leader on American soil. Furthermore, the spokesperson expressed satisfaction with India’s cooperation.

Washington alleged that Indian agents attempted to assassinate Sikh separatist leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun in New York last year. They indicted an Indian national who worked under the direction of an unnamed Indian government official.

An Indian government committee investigating Indian involvement in the foiled murder plot met with U.S. officials in Washington on Tuesday, the State Department spokesperson said.

The United States has been pushing India to look into the U.S. Justice Department’s claim that an unnamed Indian intelligence official directed plans to assassinate Pannun, a dual U.S.-Canada citizen.

The State Department spokesperson told reporters in a press briefing that the individual named in the Justice Department indictment is no longer an employee of the Indian government, without providing further details. He described the meeting as “productive.”

“We are satisfied with (their) cooperation. It continues to be an ongoing process,” the State Department spokesperson said.

“The U.S. government broadly updated members of the (Indian) committee of inquiry about the investigation that the United States has been conducting. We’ve received an update from them on the investigation that they have been conducting,” he added.

Also See: US Urges India to Seriously Address Canada Allegations Amid Enquiry Committee Formation

Assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar

The U.S. case is not the only instance in which India has allegedly targeted Sikh separatists on foreign soil.

Canada on Monday expelled Indian diplomats, linking them to the murder of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil. India also ordered the expulsion of Canadian diplomats and denies Canada’s allegations. Washington has said that India was not cooperating with Canada.

The accusations have tested Washington and Ottawa’s relations with India, often viewed by the West as a counterbalance to China.

This news is sourced from Reuters and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »