Trump’s Aid Freeze Disrupts Development Projects in Nepal and Pakistan

Trump's foreign aid freeze disrupts development in Nepal, Pakistan, and other nations, with key projects halted. [Image via Wikimedia Commons]

President Donald Trump’s recent decision to suspend foreign aid has caused significant disruptions to development efforts in Nepal and Pakistan, alongside other affected countries. This suspension, set for an initial 90-day period, follows the U.S. Department of State’s directive to halt foreign aid programs globally. Trump’s statement emphasized that the United States would no longer “blindly dole out money with no return for the American people.” While this decision affects nations such as Ukraine, Taiwan, and Jordan, U.S. officials maintain that the freeze is temporary, pending a full reassessment of future aid allocations to ensure alignment with U.S. foreign policy priorities.

In Nepal, the freeze has impacted approximately 70 USAID projects, with a total estimated value of Rs 2.66 trillion. These projects span crucial sectors like health, education, and agriculture, and are vital to the well-being of nearly 300 NGOs and organizations reliant on U.S. funding. Among the most notable affected initiatives is a $698 million project under the Development Objectives Agreement, which aims to improve economic growth and stability. The U.S. has been Nepal’s largest bilateral donor, contributing $118 million in 2022 alone, emphasizing the gravity of this suspension.

In Pakistan, the freeze has even wider-reaching consequences, with more than $800 million in U.S. assistance currently under review. The suspension affects key programs that foster democracy, governance, and economic stability. Eleven governance projects aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability, which directly impact local communities, have been temporarily halted. Additionally, five agricultural initiatives supporting over 2 million farmers—critical to Pakistan’s agricultural sector—are now on hold, creating uncertainty for rural economies.

Also See: Trump’s Return: A New Era or More of the Same?

The aid freeze also places significant pressure on Pakistan’s health and education sectors. Notable projects like the $85 million Education Direct Financing initiative, designed to improve access to education for marginalized youth, are now suspended, jeopardizing years of progress. Local leaders have raised alarms, warning that these disruptions could deepen vulnerabilities in already at-risk communities. They emphasize that U.S. aid plays a pivotal role in maintaining stability and fostering growth during challenging times.

This freeze marks a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy and its impact on global development, leaving countries like Nepal and Pakistan grappling with the uncertainty of future aid.

This news is sourced from Kathmandu Post and The Express Tribune and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »