Trade War Looms as Trump Introduces 10% Tariff on Chinese Goods

Trump plans 10% tariff on Chinese imports, citing fentanyl crisis; analysts warn of potential trade war risks. [Image via The Nation]

US President Donald Trump has announced his plan to impose a 10% tariff on Chinese imports starting on Feb. 1, a move some analysts fear could set off a trade war.

The tariff threat follows Trump’s announcement on Monday that he intends to impose a 25% duty on imports from Canada and Mexico in response to the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigrants into the US, according to local media reports.

At the White House, Trump said Tuesday the 10% tariff impositions are in response to Chinese role in the fentanyl crisis, alleging that fentanyl was being shipped from China through Canada and Mexico into the United States.

“We’re talking about a tariff of 10% on China based on the fact that they’re sending fentanyl to Mexico and Canada,” Trump said.

Trump’s plan to impose tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico could lead to economic fallout for US industries and a trade war, according to analysts.

Also See: Trump Tariffs and BRICS: A Looming Trade Standoff

In his first term, Trump secured a new trade deal with Canada and Mexico, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, and reached a limited pact with China to benefit American farmers, according to The New York Times.

He has since indicated plans to renegotiate both agreements during his second term.

Reacting to Trump’s plan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Beijing will safeguard its national interests.

“There are no winners in trade war or tariff war, and China will resolutely safeguard its national interests,” The Global Times quoted Mao as saying.

This news is sourced from The Nation and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »