Torkham Tensions: Afghan Forces Withdraw Excavator After Jirga Intervention

Afghan jirga intervenes as tensions rise at Torkham; excavator removed, ceasefire talks continue amid border dispute.

Torkham, March 10 – The border tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan took a new turn as Afghan security forces withdrew an excavator from the disputed Jungle Post following intervention by a high-level Jirga. The withdrawal comes after Pakistani Jirga members and Khyber Chamber elders strongly objected to the continued construction activities by Afghan forces, which they said violated a prior agreement.

Earlier today, Pakistani representatives informed the Afghan delegation that the ongoing border construction was in direct contradiction to the traditional Pashtun Jirga customs and previous commitments. In response, Afghan Jirga members agreed to halt construction and ordered the removal of the excavator from the site.

A second session of the Jirga is expected soon to further ease tensions and discuss a potential resolution, which could lead to the reopening of the Torkham gate, a vital trade route between the two nations.

Also See: Torkham Border Closure Enters Third Week Amid Rising Clashes

Jirga Meeting: Pakistan’s Key Demands

On Sunday, March 9, a high-level Jirga meeting between Pakistani and Afghan representatives was convened to address the escalating situation at the Torkham border. The Pakistani delegation, led by Landi Kotal Jirga elders, put forward three key demands:

  • A ceasefire by March 11
  • A halt to military construction on both sides
  • Immediate reopening of the border

Additionally, it was decided that Jirga representatives would inspect Afghan military constructions along the border on March 11 to assess the situation. However, Pakistani Jirga elders expressed concerns that the Afghan delegation lacked decision-making authority and would need to consult their leadership, particularly the Torkham Commissioner, before giving a final response.

Agreement Violated Within 24 Hours

Despite the Jirga negotiations, Afghan forces resumed construction work the very next day, breaching the agreement. Images from the site confirm the ongoing military activity, which has kept the Torkham border closed for over 17 days.

The prolonged closure has severely impacted local traders, transporters, and communities on both sides, who have urged Afghan authorities to halt further construction on Pakistani-controlled land so that trade and movement can resume.

The Root of the Dispute: The “2 Number Packet” Checkpoint

At the center of the tensions lies a disputed checkpoint known as “2 Number Packet”, which historically falls under Pakistani territory.

  • During the reign of King Zahir Shah (1933–1973), Afghanistan transferred this area to Pakistan as part of a water agreement.
  • The site remains under Pakistani control, but Afghan forces have begun constructing a new check post below the existing Pakistani position.

Torkham Jirga Proposes Temporary Ceasefire

To defuse the crisis, a Jirga was held at Torkham Zero Point two days ago. During this meeting, Pakistan proposed a one-month ceasefire and called on Afghanistan to stop unilateral border construction. Afghan delegates, however, requested more time to consult their leadership before committing to any agreement.

With the Torkham border closed for over two weeks, the economic losses and humanitarian concerns continue to mount.

Will the Border Reopen?

The situation now hinges on Afghanistan’s response on March 11. If Afghan authorities show flexibility, the border could be reopened swiftly. However, if construction continues, the dispute may escalate further.

For now, the region remains on edge as diplomatic negotiations continue.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »