Torkham Tensions: Afghan Forces Withdraw Excavator After Jirga Intervention

Afghan jirga intervenes as tensions rise at Torkham; excavator removed, ceasefire talks continue amid border dispute.

Torkham, March 10 – The border tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan took a new turn as Afghan security forces withdrew an excavator from the disputed Jungle Post following intervention by a high-level Jirga. The withdrawal comes after Pakistani Jirga members and Khyber Chamber elders strongly objected to the continued construction activities by Afghan forces, which they said violated a prior agreement.

Earlier today, Pakistani representatives informed the Afghan delegation that the ongoing border construction was in direct contradiction to the traditional Pashtun Jirga customs and previous commitments. In response, Afghan Jirga members agreed to halt construction and ordered the removal of the excavator from the site.

A second session of the Jirga is expected soon to further ease tensions and discuss a potential resolution, which could lead to the reopening of the Torkham gate, a vital trade route between the two nations.

Also See: Torkham Border Closure Enters Third Week Amid Rising Clashes

Jirga Meeting: Pakistan’s Key Demands

On Sunday, March 9, a high-level Jirga meeting between Pakistani and Afghan representatives was convened to address the escalating situation at the Torkham border. The Pakistani delegation, led by Landi Kotal Jirga elders, put forward three key demands:

  • A ceasefire by March 11
  • A halt to military construction on both sides
  • Immediate reopening of the border

Additionally, it was decided that Jirga representatives would inspect Afghan military constructions along the border on March 11 to assess the situation. However, Pakistani Jirga elders expressed concerns that the Afghan delegation lacked decision-making authority and would need to consult their leadership, particularly the Torkham Commissioner, before giving a final response.

Agreement Violated Within 24 Hours

Despite the Jirga negotiations, Afghan forces resumed construction work the very next day, breaching the agreement. Images from the site confirm the ongoing military activity, which has kept the Torkham border closed for over 17 days.

The prolonged closure has severely impacted local traders, transporters, and communities on both sides, who have urged Afghan authorities to halt further construction on Pakistani-controlled land so that trade and movement can resume.

The Root of the Dispute: The “2 Number Packet” Checkpoint

At the center of the tensions lies a disputed checkpoint known as “2 Number Packet”, which historically falls under Pakistani territory.

  • During the reign of King Zahir Shah (1933–1973), Afghanistan transferred this area to Pakistan as part of a water agreement.
  • The site remains under Pakistani control, but Afghan forces have begun constructing a new check post below the existing Pakistani position.

Torkham Jirga Proposes Temporary Ceasefire

To defuse the crisis, a Jirga was held at Torkham Zero Point two days ago. During this meeting, Pakistan proposed a one-month ceasefire and called on Afghanistan to stop unilateral border construction. Afghan delegates, however, requested more time to consult their leadership before committing to any agreement.

With the Torkham border closed for over two weeks, the economic losses and humanitarian concerns continue to mount.

Will the Border Reopen?

The situation now hinges on Afghanistan’s response on March 11. If Afghan authorities show flexibility, the border could be reopened swiftly. However, if construction continues, the dispute may escalate further.

For now, the region remains on edge as diplomatic negotiations continue.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Blood and Gold: How Sudan’s War Became the World’s Greatest Human Rights Failure:

Blood and Gold: How Sudan’s War Became the World’s Greatest Human Rights Failure

Sudan’s war is not misunderstood, it is deliberately ignored. Fuelled by a gold economy tied to foreign profiteers, the conflict has dismantled the country while the world watches in silence. As the RSF and SAF wage a war built on extraction and exploitation, millions are displaced, starved, and erased from global concern. Sudan’s suffering exposes a deeper truth: human rights protections collapse where profit thrives and African lives remain invisible.

Read More »
The New Bollywood

The New Bollywood

Bollywood, once India’s most effective soft-power tool, is undergoing a dramatic ideological overhaul. Films like Dhurandhar and The Taj Story reflect a new cinematic nationalism rooted in historical revisionism, internal othering, and aggressive anti-Pakistan narratives, reshaping both India’s identity and its global cultural reach.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s 2025 trade boycott of Pakistan exposes a strategic miscalculation. Despite efforts to shift toward Iran and Central Asia, Kabul remains structurally dependent on Pakistan’s mature trade corridors, customs revenue, labour mobility, and logistical efficiency. Alternative routes carry higher costs, sanctions risks, and operational delays, leaving the Taliban with mounting fiscal losses and regional constraints.

Read More »
The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign examines how indirect US funding and a $7 billion abandoned arsenal have turned the Taliban into a regional force multiplier for militant groups.

Read More »