The US Reaches out to Turkey; As it Struggles with the Middle East

The US needs help to deal with its Al-Qaeda and ISIS connections. The US reached out to Turkey for the help of another political transition in the Greater Middle East and in Afghanistan. Subsequently, after ten years the US tried to play a pioneering role in Turkey by launching its regime change project.

Most certainly, analogies in politics or diplomacy never hold 100% but their similarities are remarkable. In Syria, the plan involved the overthrow of President Bashar al-established Assad\’s government. Similarly, the agenda in Afghanistan is somehow to ease President Ashraf Ghani\’s elected government. Subsequently, to make it replenished by an interim administration which includes the Taliban militant Islamist group. Technically, both circumstances are reduced to jihadi groups that mask themselves as \’liberation movements.

Turkey’s Support for ISIS and Al-Qaida

Furthermore, in Syria, Turkey provided logistics and support to jihadis to join the country. These also included medical assistance for the horrendous war on Assad.

The fact that Turkey has mentored the ISIS and al-Qaeda executives is undeniable. A CNN shipment in Turkey, November 2013, noted that \”it is extraordinary to watch the international traffic volume from countries with a confirmed and consistent NATO membership presence in al-Qaeda\”. Many of these devout Muslims feel that they will be part of the final battle. Known as the al-Sham, the final battle marking the end of the world. The battle will occur in Syria, as believed. The recruits are ecstatic; as they never thought this final battle would come in their life.

America\’s Major Concerns in Syria

By the same token, this unholy alliance in Syria between the United States and Turkey on one hand, and ISIS and al-Qaeda on the other, was repeatedly called the attention of Russia and Iran. Curiously, even today this unholy covenant continues.

In March, the last year al-Qaeda openly commended the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his government. The Government stood up for al-Qaeda. Along with them, other jihadi organisations were also seeking to overthrow Syria\’s secular government. Al-Nusra is the name of their largest branch. The organization now calls itself Hay\’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).

In an interview on the 8th of March 2021, American ambassador James Jeffrey expressed his views regarding HTS. He stated that the northwest province in Syria along the border with Turkey, HTS was \’an asset\’ to the US strategy.

Besides, as Jeffrey puts it, HTS \”is the least bad choice for the different Idlib options\”. Further adding that Idlib is one of the most significant places in Syria, and the most important in the Middle East right now.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »