The Changing Face of Democracy in Nepal

Nepal is facing political turmoil during the pandemic. President Bhandari dissolved the House of Representatives. Therefore, in November 2021, a fresh election will take place. The purpose of the election is to elect the 275 members for the sixth time in the history of Nepal. This is the second attempt in five months by the President to dissolve the House of Representatives. The dissolution of House in December 2020 was however restored as the Supreme Court annulled the decision. The proper tenure of the existing House will expire in March 2023.

Democratic Struggle in Nepal

The present-day democracy of Nepal has sailed through a long voyage of seven decades. Multiple factors affected the first movement for the establishment of democratic rule. These included; expansion of the education system, higher literacy rate and Indian independence. In December 1960, King Mahendra came into power and introduced the Panchayat system with few democratic norms. The post rule of King Mahendra used repressive tactics for the anti-regime movements. These tactics ultimately resulted in the formation of ‘Jana Andolan’ in 1990. This movement was large, and it mobilized many public sectors calling for a mass movement. This resulted in the restoration of democracy with a multiparty system.

Post-1991

The post-1991 period was more violent as compared to the earlier periods. There were mass protests, violence and insurgencies that resulted in the death of thousands. The constitutional monarchy implemented in 1991 witnessed political instability due to internal party battles and corruption. The midterm elections for the House of Representatives produced eight unstable governments in five years. This anarchical situation led to the people’s war demanding the end of monarchy and the establishment of the constituent assembly. In June 2001, the Nepalese royal family was murdered. The crowning of Gyanendra as a new king of the country took place right after this incident. This ultimately worsened the situation in the country.

The ultimate long armed struggle resulted in a peace agreement signed between the seven-party alliance and Maoist insurgents. It was a 12 point agreement that demanded the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of democratic norms. Moreover, it also included a demand to establish an interim government, the holding of fair elections, effective governance, civil, political, and human rights with the rule of law. Hence the elections of 2008 marked the victory of the Communist Party and Pushpa Kamal Dahal became PM of Nepal.

Current Political Turmoil in Nepal

The end of monarchy in 2008 marks the real struggle of Nepal regarding its transition towards federal democracy. In the 2018 elections, no single party was able to get a complete majority to form a government. So, the two main political parties i.e., the Communist Party of Nepal under KP Sharma Oli and the Communist Party of Nepal under Pushpa Kamal Dahal agreed to share the Premiership for two and half years each. Hence, it was agreed that Oli will complete his term as a prime minister. Soon after, a campaign of charges and countercharges was started. This led to the dissolution of the house.

The Supreme Court annulled the decision. However, a follow to another writ petition annulled the decision of the election commission which brought Oli’s government into the minority. Oli was then defeated in a no-confidence motion which ultimately led to the dissolution of the house. The dissolution by the President will end political drama ongoing in Nepal especially after the merging of two parties. Although there is nothing unusual in Nepal which has witnessed the change of 25 Prime ministers in the last 29 years.

However, hope remains because the 2015 constitution provides a federal democratic republic with three tiers i.e., Federal, Provincial, and local. These are the basis of democracy which makes the deep-rooted system with a sense of duty and pride. Moreover, it will also be beneficial to check the corruptions at all levels making the system transparent. Furthermore, it will make the governance easy and transparent that will create political awareness in Nepal.

Conclusion

The current political turmoil reflects the decades-long struggle of Nepal regarding its transition towards federal democracy. The dissolution of the House will end the political drama running in Nepal after the 2008 elections. However, hope is still there due to the basis of democratic norms embedded in the federal democracy, which will further strengthen the system and rule of law.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »