The Changing Face of Democracy in Nepal

Nepal is facing political turmoil during the pandemic. President Bhandari dissolved the House of Representatives. Therefore, in November 2021, a fresh election will take place. The purpose of the election is to elect the 275 members for the sixth time in the history of Nepal. This is the second attempt in five months by the President to dissolve the House of Representatives. The dissolution of House in December 2020 was however restored as the Supreme Court annulled the decision. The proper tenure of the existing House will expire in March 2023.

Democratic Struggle in Nepal

The present-day democracy of Nepal has sailed through a long voyage of seven decades. Multiple factors affected the first movement for the establishment of democratic rule. These included; expansion of the education system, higher literacy rate and Indian independence. In December 1960, King Mahendra came into power and introduced the Panchayat system with few democratic norms. The post rule of King Mahendra used repressive tactics for the anti-regime movements. These tactics ultimately resulted in the formation of ‘Jana Andolan’ in 1990. This movement was large, and it mobilized many public sectors calling for a mass movement. This resulted in the restoration of democracy with a multiparty system.

Post-1991

The post-1991 period was more violent as compared to the earlier periods. There were mass protests, violence and insurgencies that resulted in the death of thousands. The constitutional monarchy implemented in 1991 witnessed political instability due to internal party battles and corruption. The midterm elections for the House of Representatives produced eight unstable governments in five years. This anarchical situation led to the people’s war demanding the end of monarchy and the establishment of the constituent assembly. In June 2001, the Nepalese royal family was murdered. The crowning of Gyanendra as a new king of the country took place right after this incident. This ultimately worsened the situation in the country.

The ultimate long armed struggle resulted in a peace agreement signed between the seven-party alliance and Maoist insurgents. It was a 12 point agreement that demanded the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of democratic norms. Moreover, it also included a demand to establish an interim government, the holding of fair elections, effective governance, civil, political, and human rights with the rule of law. Hence the elections of 2008 marked the victory of the Communist Party and Pushpa Kamal Dahal became PM of Nepal.

Current Political Turmoil in Nepal

The end of monarchy in 2008 marks the real struggle of Nepal regarding its transition towards federal democracy. In the 2018 elections, no single party was able to get a complete majority to form a government. So, the two main political parties i.e., the Communist Party of Nepal under KP Sharma Oli and the Communist Party of Nepal under Pushpa Kamal Dahal agreed to share the Premiership for two and half years each. Hence, it was agreed that Oli will complete his term as a prime minister. Soon after, a campaign of charges and countercharges was started. This led to the dissolution of the house.

The Supreme Court annulled the decision. However, a follow to another writ petition annulled the decision of the election commission which brought Oli’s government into the minority. Oli was then defeated in a no-confidence motion which ultimately led to the dissolution of the house. The dissolution by the President will end political drama ongoing in Nepal especially after the merging of two parties. Although there is nothing unusual in Nepal which has witnessed the change of 25 Prime ministers in the last 29 years.

However, hope remains because the 2015 constitution provides a federal democratic republic with three tiers i.e., Federal, Provincial, and local. These are the basis of democracy which makes the deep-rooted system with a sense of duty and pride. Moreover, it will also be beneficial to check the corruptions at all levels making the system transparent. Furthermore, it will make the governance easy and transparent that will create political awareness in Nepal.

Conclusion

The current political turmoil reflects the decades-long struggle of Nepal regarding its transition towards federal democracy. The dissolution of the House will end the political drama running in Nepal after the 2008 elections. However, hope is still there due to the basis of democratic norms embedded in the federal democracy, which will further strengthen the system and rule of law.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »