Taliban Impose Travel Ban on Over 8,000 Former Government Officials

Taliban bans 8,192 individuals, including former government officials, from leaving Afghanistan without leader's approval. [Image via Afghanistan International]

A Taliban official letter has revealed that 8,192 individuals, including former government officials, have been prohibited from leaving the country in 1403 (Solar Hijri Calendar).

The directive, issued by the Directorate for Supervision and Execution of Orders—formerly the Attorney General’s Office—states that these individuals are banned from international travel due to “numerous cases related to them, each containing dozens of volumes.”

Taliban Leader’s Direct Order

According to official documents, Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban’s supreme leader, has personally ordered that these individuals cannot leave Afghanistan without his written approval.

This move comes despite the earlier announcement of the Taliban of a “general amnesty” for former government officials following their takeover of power in August 2021. Since then, however, the group has compiled hundreds of pages of files on these individuals.

Leaked Documents Expose Travel Restrictions

Recently, a hacking group leaked hundreds of pages of classified Taliban documents from several key ministries, including the Directorate for Supervision and Execution of Orders. Portions of these documents have been accessed and shared with Afghanistan International.

One official memorandum on the travel ban also states that any Taliban officials with related criminal or personal files are similarly barred from leaving the country without the Taliban leader’s permission.

Also See: Afghanistan’s Taliban: Stuck in the Past, While the World Moves Forward

Unclear Legal Proceedings Against Former Officials

The details of the charges against former officials remain unclear. However, the documents suggest that the Taliban intends to pursue multiple cases against them.

It is still unknown how many of these individuals have been interrogated, had their cases reviewed in Taliban courts, or received formal verdicts. The Taliban has not provided further clarification on the legal status of these cases.

This news is sourced from Afghanistan International and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Narrative by Design: Al Jazeera’s Editorial Tilt on the Pakistan–TTP Conflict

Narrative by Design: Al Jazeera’s Editorial Tilt on the Pakistan–TTP Conflict

Al Jazeera’s reputation for alternative journalism contrasts sharply with its recent reporting on Pakistan’s conflict with the TTP and tensions with the Afghan Taliban. A close review shows consistent editorial choices that soften the Taliban’s image, reframe terrorist violence as resistance, and cast Pakistan’s counter-terrorism actions as aggression—ultimately reshaping the narrative in Kabul’s favour.

Read More »
Modern Platforms, Evolving Doctrine

Modern Platforms, Evolving Doctrine

The Gulf’s air-power evolution is increasingly shaped by the fusion of advanced platforms with modern doctrine and faster decision cycles. As regional forces adapt to complex threat environments, partners like Pakistan, whose operational experience spans multiple domains, are becoming part of the broader conversation on future air-power thinking.

Read More »
Economic Engagement or Ethical Dilemma? Canada-India Relations and the Nijjar Case

Economic Engagement or Ethical Dilemma? Canada-India Relations and the Nijjar Case

Canada’s renewed trade outreach to India comes at a moment of deep diplomatic strain. As Minister Maninder Sidhu seeks to revive economic cooperation, the unresolved assassination of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, and allegations implicating senior Indian officials, cast a long shadow. The controversy raises critical questions about whether Ottawa can balance economic ambitions with justice, accountability, and the protection of Canadian sovereignty.

Read More »
Zohran Mamdani calls out Modi and Netanyahu as war criminals, linking Gujarat 2002 and Gaza, and demands global justice and accountability.

Zohran Mamdani Stands Up for Justice: Holding Modi and Netanyahu Accountable

Zohran Mamdani, a rising progressive voice in the U.S., has boldly equated Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with war crimes. Drawing on global principles like the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and ICC indictments, Mamdani challenges the immunity of influential leaders and advocates for accountability for mass atrocities in Gujarat (2002) and Gaza.

Read More »