Taliban Impose Travel Ban on Over 8,000 Former Government Officials

Taliban bans 8,192 individuals, including former government officials, from leaving Afghanistan without leader's approval. [Image via Afghanistan International]

A Taliban official letter has revealed that 8,192 individuals, including former government officials, have been prohibited from leaving the country in 1403 (Solar Hijri Calendar).

The directive, issued by the Directorate for Supervision and Execution of Orders—formerly the Attorney General’s Office—states that these individuals are banned from international travel due to “numerous cases related to them, each containing dozens of volumes.”

Taliban Leader’s Direct Order

According to official documents, Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban’s supreme leader, has personally ordered that these individuals cannot leave Afghanistan without his written approval.

This move comes despite the earlier announcement of the Taliban of a “general amnesty” for former government officials following their takeover of power in August 2021. Since then, however, the group has compiled hundreds of pages of files on these individuals.

Leaked Documents Expose Travel Restrictions

Recently, a hacking group leaked hundreds of pages of classified Taliban documents from several key ministries, including the Directorate for Supervision and Execution of Orders. Portions of these documents have been accessed and shared with Afghanistan International.

One official memorandum on the travel ban also states that any Taliban officials with related criminal or personal files are similarly barred from leaving the country without the Taliban leader’s permission.

Also See: Afghanistan’s Taliban: Stuck in the Past, While the World Moves Forward

Unclear Legal Proceedings Against Former Officials

The details of the charges against former officials remain unclear. However, the documents suggest that the Taliban intends to pursue multiple cases against them.

It is still unknown how many of these individuals have been interrogated, had their cases reviewed in Taliban courts, or received formal verdicts. The Taliban has not provided further clarification on the legal status of these cases.

This news is sourced from Afghanistan International and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

As Bihar votes, Modi’s militarised politics faces its toughest test yet—will voters reject war rhetoric for real issues like jobs and poverty?

Bihar Should Reject Modi’s War Politics

Bihar’s election is shaping up as a test of Modi’s war-driven politics. With rising discontent over unemployment and poor governance, voters may choose to look past jingoism and focus on the real issues that shape their daily lives.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace represents a major shift from fraternal idealism to strategic realism in South Asia’s volatile security landscape. Rooted in classical realist thought, the doctrine emphasizes verification over trust, deterrence over sentiment, and conditional diplomacy over blind faith. Confronting the twin challenges of cross-border militancy and Indian-backed proxy networks in Afghanistan, Islamabad now seeks peace that is enforceable, monitored, and verifiable, anchoring regional stability on responsibility, not rhetoric.

Read More »
When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »