Study Tour on Waqf Bill Postponed Amid Opposition Boycott

Study tour on Waqf Bill postponed after Opposition boycott, citing unilateral decisions by panel chairperson. [Image via Indian Express]

The study tour of the Joint Committee of Parliament (JCP) on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill was postponed Monday, days after Opposition members of the panel boycotted it.

The tour started on Saturday from Guwahati and covered Bhubaneswar on Sunday. However, it was halted following a notice by the Lok Sabha Secretariat stating that the remaining part of the study tour on the Waqf Bill to Kolkata, Patna and Lucknow (Tuesday-Thursday) was being postponed.

The notice comes on the heels of Opposition members, who are part of the panel, announcing their decision to boycott the study tour on November 7. Among those who boycotted the tour were leaders from the Congress, Samajwadi Party, DMK, AAP, and AIMIM.

The tour, which was scheduled from November 9-14, was planned so that the members would hear views of diverse stakeholders on the matter.

Also See: India’s Waqf Bill 2024: The State’s Assault on Muslim Heritage

While announcing the boycott, TMC’s Kalyan Banerjee had accused the House panel’s chairperson, Jagdambika Pal, of turning the proceedings into a “mockery”.

Congress member Mohammad Jawed had also earlier said, “We are also answerable to people in our constituencies and respective parties. We understand the committee is an important one, but we need time to prepare for tours and meetings.”

Opposition members of the committee had on November 4 written to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and threatened to “disassociate” from the panel, accusing Pal of “bulldozing the proceedings” and “stonewalling” them. On November 5, the members met Birla and discussed their issues.

Accusing Pal of taking “unilateral decisions on fixing the dates of sittings even for consecutive three days, where persons/ bodies (are) to be called as witness”, they had said that it is not “practically possible” for them to prepare.

This news is sourced from Indian Express and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »