Sri Lanka Faces Heavy Defeat In Galle Amid Controversial Selections

Australia dominates Sri Lanka in Galle, exposing poor preparation, weak batting, and outdated team strategies. [Image via Daily Mirror]

Sri Lanka has indeed lost games before at Galle, but the manner in which the Australians dominated the proceedings from the very first ball of the series suggests that this will go down as one of Sri Lanka’s worst performances ever at home.

While Australian batsmen have had a proper training camp in Dubai ahead of the massive test of spin at Galle, it seemed that the Sri Lankan batters had very little preparation against spin as even Travis Head and Beau Webster ended up taking wickets. 

Having lost the first Test, Sri Lanka made some really interesting calls ahead of second Test. Nishan Peiris ended up with figures of 189 for no wickets in first Test – many expected him to be dropped from the Playing XI after that performance, but instead Sri Lanka dropped the leg-spinner Jeffrey Vandersay who was the only silver lining in what was an embarrassing defeat in first Test.

They however, brought Ramesh Mendis – another off-spinner back into the team for reasons nobody really understands. At this point somehow, Sri Lanka had two specialist right arm off-spinners and one left arm spinner, yet they’d open the bowling with the part-time off-spin of captain Dhananjaya de Silva which could only exist in virtual gaming or in a team led by Silva himself.

With almost all the other teams in the world prioritising the bowlers who could bat, Sri Lanka are still stuck on the cricket played by Sanath Jayasuriya a couple of decades ago, with such a long tail.

In the Australian Playing XI, only Mathew Kuhnemann had a low batting average. When it comes to Sri Lankan batting, they are literally all out after losing their sixth wicket.

Even the top order batting was way below average with most of the batters failing to make a significant contributions.

Also See: What’s Behind the Crackdown by Sri Lanka on Israeli Tourists

Australia probably noticed this after winning first Test that they decided to just play three front line bowlers in Mitchell Starc, Mathew Kuhnemann and Nathan Lyon.

They found Sri Lanka too easy that they decided to play with ten men in the second Test bringing in Cooper Connolly who is not a Test batsman or bowler at this stage of his career. Prabath Jayasuriya has had an excellent start to his career at home – he has probably done nothing overseas.

He makes almost no contributions with the bat. There are so many left arm spinners in Sri Lanka who could get wickets against weaker oppositions at Galle – but if they make zero contributions with the bat, the team wouldn’t necessarily be successful. 

Sri Lanka cricket will remain at the same level they are today, should they not introduce different approaches against different opponents, and encourage bowlers who could score some runs down the order. 

This news is sourced from Daily Mirror and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »