PMML Requests Return of Nehru Letters for Public Access

PMML requests Rahul Gandhi to return historic letters of Jawaharlal Nehru to enable public access and research opportunities. [Image via NDTV]

New Delhi: The Prime Minister’s Museum and Library (PMML) has appealed to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to return the collection of historical letters belonging to former prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. These letters were removed from public access in 2008 at the request of Sonia Gandhi, the then-chairperson of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), and have since been stored privately.

The collection of letters, originally transferred to the PMML, formerly the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), in 1971 by the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund, comprises 51 boxes containing personal correspondences PM Nehru exchanged with some of the 20th century’s most prominent figures. Among them are letters to Albert Einstein, Jayaprakash Narayan, Edwina Mountbatten, Padmaja Naidu, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Aruna Asaf Ali, and Babu Jagjivan Ram. 

“We understand that these documents may hold personal significance for the ‘Nehru family.’ However, the PMML believes that making these historical materials, more widely accessible would greatly benefit scholars and researchers. We would be grateful for your collaboration in exploring possible solutions,” the PMML’s letter reads. 

The letter to Mr Gandhi follows an earlier correspondence to Sonia Gandhi in September 2024, in which she was requested to return or digitisation of the documents. 

“In September 2024, I wrote a letter to Sonia Gandhi requesting that the 51 cartoons from approximately eight different sections, which were part of the Nehru collections at the Prime Ministers’ Museum (formerly the Nehru Memorial), be either returned to the institution, or we be granted permission to scan them, or provided with their scanned copies. This would allow us to study them and facilitate research by various scholars,” said Rizwan Kadri, historian and author Rizwan Kadri who is among the 29 members of the PMML Society, which Prime Minister Narendra Modi heads. 

Also See: India: The Cricket Hegemony

The PMML was originally established as the NMML in PM Nehru’s former residence, the Teen Murti Bhavan in New Delhi to honour his legacy and promote the study of modern Indian history. The NMML’s charter outlined maintaining a museum dedicated to PM Nehru’s life, acquiring and preserving his personal papers and those of other leaders, and allowing research through access to archives, lectures, and publications.

In August last year, the NMML was renamed the Prime Minister’s Museum and Library to recognise the contributions of all Indian Prime Ministers.

According to official records presented at the PMML’s Annual General Meeting in February, a collection of PM Nehru’s personal letters was transferred to the NMML beginning in 1971. These papers were allegedly sent by the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund on behalf of PM Nehru’s legal heir, former prime minister Indira Gandhi, for safekeeping rather than as a permanent gift.

The PMML claims that the ownership of these papers remained with PM Nehru’s heirs, including Sonia Gandhi after Indira Gandhi’s death in 1984. A 1988 letter allegedly states that access to these papers required Sonia Gandhi’s explicit permission. 

This news is sourced from NDTV and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »