Pasban-e-Hurriyat Exposes Indian Atrocities in Jammu and Kashmir in January from 1990

Pasban-e-Hurriyat reports on the mass killings of Kashmiri civilians by Indian forces in Jammu and Kashmir.

Pasban-e-Hurriyat Jammu and Kashmir issued an investigative report on massacre of Kashmiri people by Indian soldiers.

According to details, it was stated that India has massacred innocent citizens more than 9 times in Illegally Occupied Kashmir.

Report revealed that Indian government has killed thousands of citizens in Occupied Kashmir who have been demanding their democratic, political and social rights.

“Indian government has mass-murdered thousands of Kashmiri civilians in the month of pretend democracy in its occupied state of Jammu and Kashmir in January for the last three decades”, said Chairman Pasban-e-Hurriyat Uzair Ahmed Ghazali.

The report stated that in different years, in the month of January, the 26th of which India celebrates the Republic Day, the Indian forces have committed the act of mass murder more than nine times.

Also See: The Kashmir Tragedy: A Genocide Ignored

Pasban-e-Hurriyat report stated that calling India a democratic country is nothing but a collective lie.

“The way the Indian soldiers massacred the Kashmiri people in occupied Kashmir in the month of January, the United Nations should hold India accountable for all these crimes”, report revealed.

The report also stated that on January 8, 1990, Indian soldiers opened fire on innocent civilians in Srinagar city, in which 17 civilians were martyred.

On January 19, 1990, the Delhi government imposed governor’s rule for the first time in occupied Kashmir and gave the notorious Jag Mohan free rein to massacre the Kashmiri people.

On January 21, 1990, more than 60 civilians were martyred by Indian soldiers in Gao Kadal area and around 3 hundred civilians were injured.

On January 22, 1990, 10 civilians were martyred by the Indian forces in Alamgiri Bazar.

It is stated in the report that on January 25, 1990, Indian soldiers martyred 26 civilians in Handwara.

On January 1991, 16 civilians were martyred in Magar Mal area.

On January 6, 1993, brutality was unleashed on the residents of Sopore city where 57 civilians were martyred by indiscriminate firing and hundreds were injured by bullets.

On January 27, 1994, Indian soldiers shot at 27 shopkeepers and passers-by in Kupwara city because they had kept their shops closed on January 26, the so-called Indian Republic Day.

On January 25, 1998, Indian killer soldiers fired on innocent civilians in Windhama killing 28 innocent civilians.

The report stated that the month of January has been a month of grief for the Kashmiri people, in which the Indian troops tried to crush the Kashmiri citizens through coercion and killed thousands of citizens in different districts, cities, towns and villages of the state.

This news is sourced from Daily Times and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »