Pakistan Urges Taliban to Remain Involved in the Peace Process

Pakistan has encouraged the Taliban to stay involved in the Afghan peace process. This was after the announcement that they will boycott all Afghan summits before all foreign powers have left. The decision was made after the US announced last week that it would withdraw all troops by September 11 this year. The new deadline is a few months longer than the previous administration\’s which was May 1.

Pakistan to Convince Taliban

“They make their own decisions but we will do whatever we can to convince them that it is in their national interest to remain engaged,” Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said of the Taliban in an interview in Abu Dhabi.

“The troops will be out and a date has been given and the process starts on the 1st of May and goes on until the 11th of September so there is a definite time frame,” Qureshi said. According to Reuters, Pakistan is pressuring the party to return to the negotiating table. Qureshi said he thought the Taliban would benefit from remaining in the war, but he had no contact with them.

Pakistan has significant clout with the Taliban. Pakistan has facilitated US-Taliban talks in Doha that culminated in the initial May 1 withdrawal agreement. According to US and Afghan officials, the organization has sanctuaries in Pakistan. According to them, they are supported by the country\’s largest military-run intelligence service. The accusation is denied by Pakistan.

The Dangers of Peace Talk Stalling

The rejection has thrown the peace process into disarray. On Saturday, in Turkey, the Taliban and Afghans had scheduled a meeting. The negotiators hoped it would generate fresh impetus for a diplomatic settlement.

The Taliban ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. After 2001, the US military forces took over the region. However, they still have control over large areas of the country. According to Qureshi, withdrawal delays are still a risk due to logistics. Although the Taliban have effectively succeeded in their goal of withdrawing foreign forces, they could be flexible with the new September 11 deadline.

If the peace process remains stalled, Qureshi fears that violence will escalate. Inevitably, plunging Afghanistan into civil war and leading to a mass exodus of Afghans.

Pakistan, which is home to nearly 3 million Afghan refugees and economic migrants, has completed 90 per cent of a fence along its disputed 2,500-kilometer (1,500-mile) border with Afghanistan, which he hopes to finish by September.

Pakistan-India Ties

Moreover, Qureshi stated that India should restore the statehood of Indian-administered Kashmir. It will possibly only after this that the two countries will engage in a dialogue.

“We are two atomic powers that should not go into a direct conflict. It would be suicidal,” Qureshi said.

He added, however, that he had no plans to speak with his Indian counterpart, who is also in the UAE this week.

Sources told Reuters last week that top intelligence officers from India and Pakistan met in secret in Dubai in January in a new attempt to defuse military tensions over the contested Himalayan territory of Kashmir.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »