Pakistan Urges Taliban to Remain Involved in the Peace Process

Pakistan has encouraged the Taliban to stay involved in the Afghan peace process. This was after the announcement that they will boycott all Afghan summits before all foreign powers have left. The decision was made after the US announced last week that it would withdraw all troops by September 11 this year. The new deadline is a few months longer than the previous administration\’s which was May 1.

Pakistan to Convince Taliban

“They make their own decisions but we will do whatever we can to convince them that it is in their national interest to remain engaged,” Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said of the Taliban in an interview in Abu Dhabi.

“The troops will be out and a date has been given and the process starts on the 1st of May and goes on until the 11th of September so there is a definite time frame,” Qureshi said. According to Reuters, Pakistan is pressuring the party to return to the negotiating table. Qureshi said he thought the Taliban would benefit from remaining in the war, but he had no contact with them.

Pakistan has significant clout with the Taliban. Pakistan has facilitated US-Taliban talks in Doha that culminated in the initial May 1 withdrawal agreement. According to US and Afghan officials, the organization has sanctuaries in Pakistan. According to them, they are supported by the country\’s largest military-run intelligence service. The accusation is denied by Pakistan.

The Dangers of Peace Talk Stalling

The rejection has thrown the peace process into disarray. On Saturday, in Turkey, the Taliban and Afghans had scheduled a meeting. The negotiators hoped it would generate fresh impetus for a diplomatic settlement.

The Taliban ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. After 2001, the US military forces took over the region. However, they still have control over large areas of the country. According to Qureshi, withdrawal delays are still a risk due to logistics. Although the Taliban have effectively succeeded in their goal of withdrawing foreign forces, they could be flexible with the new September 11 deadline.

If the peace process remains stalled, Qureshi fears that violence will escalate. Inevitably, plunging Afghanistan into civil war and leading to a mass exodus of Afghans.

Pakistan, which is home to nearly 3 million Afghan refugees and economic migrants, has completed 90 per cent of a fence along its disputed 2,500-kilometer (1,500-mile) border with Afghanistan, which he hopes to finish by September.

Pakistan-India Ties

Moreover, Qureshi stated that India should restore the statehood of Indian-administered Kashmir. It will possibly only after this that the two countries will engage in a dialogue.

“We are two atomic powers that should not go into a direct conflict. It would be suicidal,” Qureshi said.

He added, however, that he had no plans to speak with his Indian counterpart, who is also in the UAE this week.

Sources told Reuters last week that top intelligence officers from India and Pakistan met in secret in Dubai in January in a new attempt to defuse military tensions over the contested Himalayan territory of Kashmir.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »