Pakistan Says Mediation efforts between Saudi and Iran Move Slowly

Hoping for mediation

Prime Minister Imran Khan released a statement on Monday. He said that Pakistan’s U.S. requested mediation efforts between Gulf rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran have been making slow progress.

Prompted by Washington, former cricket great Khan in October visited Tehran and Riyadh. Pakistan has been making efforts since then to facilitate talks between the KSA and Iran. After attacks on Gulf oil interests, which the United States blamed on Iran, relations have been icy between the two countries. Moreover, tensions have been rising between Riyadh and Tehran over myriad issues. One of these is the war in Yemen where the kingdom is battling the Houthi rebel movement.

Islamabad and Tehran’s bilateral relations

For years, ties between Iran and Pakistan have remained tense due to a deep mutual mistrust. Generally, Islamabad has tried to maintain close ties with both, Saudi Arabia and Iran, but has drifted away from Tehran in the past few years.

Both Islamabad and Tehran accuse each other of backing and facilitating separatist groups, active in the Baluchistan provinces and seek independence from both neighbours.

In March, President Rouhani demanded Pakistan act decisively against anti-Iranian terrorists. An attack in February attack killed 27 members of the elite Revolutionary Guard in Sistan-Baluchistan was claimed Jaish al-Adl (Army of Justice). Tehran claimed that the suicide bomber was a Pakistani, and says the banned outfit operates mostly out of Pakistan.

Iran is also angered by Pakistan\’s role in the Saudi-led military alliance that is operating against Shiite Houthi rebels in Yemen.

PM Imran Khan’s statement

“Our mediation between Iran and Saudi Arabia has not stopped and we are making progress, but slowly,” PM Khan told Al Jazeera. The broadcaster released extracts from an interview which is set to be aired in full on Wednesday.

Prime Minister Imran Khan added, “We have done our best to avoid a military confrontation between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and our efforts have succeeded,” Qatar-based Al Jazeera reported.

What is on the cards?

Shi’ite Muslim Iran has long been at odds with U.S. Gulf Sunni Arab ally Saudi Arabia. U.S.-Iranian frictions worsened when President Donald Trump’s administration withdrew in mid-2018 from an accord. The accord limited Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for easing sanctions.

Islamabad is stepping up efforts to defuse tensions between the Gulf neighbours. Pakistan can rightly fear that a possible US-backed war with Iran would spill over into Pakistan. This could also possibly unleash sectarian violence between the country\’s majority Sunni and minority Shiite populations. Moreover, it would spell out an economic disaster for a country with an already frail economy.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »