Pakistan Pledges Commitment to UN Charter as Non-Permanent Member of the Security Council

Pakistan commits to the UN Charter as a non-permanent Security Council member, focusing on Kashmir, reforms, and global conflicts. [Image via Reuters]

UNITED NATIONS: Pakistan has pledged to continue its role as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), upholding the UN Charter and advancing global peace initiatives.

It will work alongside the other 14 members of the Council to promote these shared objectives. Pakistan’s stance on the Kashmir issue aligns with the United Nations’ position, emphasizing its resolution in accordance with the Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination, as recognized by the UN resolutions.

In his first exclusive interview with The News, Pakistan’s newly appointed additional permanent representative to the UN, Asim Iftikhar, stated, “We desire the same resolution for Kashmir as the UN, which recognizes it as a disputed territory and has promised the Kashmiri people the right to self-determination. Pakistan remains committed to implementing this decision.” Highlighting the broader global challenges, including the ongoing Ukraine war and the devastation the Middle East, Iftikhar underscored Pakistan’s dedication to playing a constructive role in promoting peace through the UNSC framework. However, he criticised the influence of veto powers held by major global players and structural flaws within the UN system, which he blamed for the council’s inability to effectively address these conflicts.

Also See: United Nations: An Institution in Need of Reforms

Earlier, a flag-raising ceremony was held at the UN headquarters to welcome five newly elected non-permanent members of the Security Council for the 2025-2026 term: Pakistan, Panama, Somalia, Greece, and Denmark. Representatives from these nations, along with senior UN officials, addressed the gathering. Wearing a traditional sherwani, Asim Iftikhar raised Pakistan’s flag outside the Security Council chambers, kissed it, and proudly unfurled it — a gesture that drew attention from diplomats and journalists present.

Asim Iftikhar has taken on the role of alternate envoy to the UN following his tenure as Pakistan’s ambassador to France. He will succeed Munir Akram as Pakistan’s permanent representative to the UN after Akram’s retirement. Currently, Akram is in Islamabad, while Iftikhar prepares to assume full responsibilities in New York.

In the interview, Iftikhar also elaborated on Pakistan’s position regarding reforms and expansion of the Security Council, describing it as a key agenda item during Pakistan’s tenure. He reaffirmed Pakistan’s commitment to advocating for equitable representation and systemic improvements within the council.

This news is sourced from The News and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »