Pakistan faces $18 billion fine as Iran gas pipeline completion delayed, risking energy security

Pakistan faces $18 billion fine as Iran gas pipeline completion delayed, risking energy security

Pakistan could face a whopping $18 billion as a penalty for not completing the gas pipeline project with Iran in the time frame stipulated in the agreement.

The Public Accounts Committee of Parliament, which met with its chairman Noor Alam Khan in the chair on Wednesday, deliberated on the non-utilization of Rs 332 billion ($4 billion) in gas infrastructure development cess, which was collected for developing three mega gas projects, including the building of a pipeline to import gas from Iran

Committee member Syed Hussain Tariq said that the funds are lying idle and the projects are stagnant, warning that Pakistan faces fines if the gas pipeline project with Iran is not completed on time, The Express Tribune newspaper reported.

A top official from the petroleum ministry told the meeting that Pakistan has spoken to the United States about the Iran gas pipeline project to ask for relief.

He pointed out that there is a ban on importing gas from Iran, and Pakistan cannot buy it, the report said.

He also highlighted the safety and security concerns in the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India pipeline project.

Also See: Oxygen Crisis Pakistan may Import Oxygen from China or Iran

The members of the committee asked how much could be imposed as a penalty on Pakistan for not completing the Iran gas pipeline on time. The petroleum secretary responded that as per the agreement, the penalty could be $18 billion, the report said.

He also remarked that they have asked the U.S. ambassador to either give them permission to go ahead with the project or give them money to pay the fine, it said.

The chairman then directed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to call the US envoy and inform him about the gravity of the situation. He also reiterated the two options mentioned by the secretary of petroleum.

The Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project was conceived years back and initially, India was also its part but it withdrew later on due to differences on various issues.

The project cannot be completed due to sanctions imposed on Iran by the U.S. due to Tehran’s nuclear program.

Source: The Cradle

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Disinformation in Pakistan exploits social media to manipulate perception, undermine the judiciary, and destabilize governance.

Disinformation, Digital Propaganda, and the Erosion of the Rule of Law

While online narratives often claim to expose corruption or political repression, coordinated digital propaganda masks a strategic effort to delegitimize state institutions. This commentary examines the interplay of monetized disinformation, coordinated amplification, and selective framing, revealing how Pakistan’s digital ecosystem substitutes outrage for evidence and destabilizes governance.

Read More »
As instability spreads from Afghanistan’s north, Tajikistan faces renewed militant pressure, exposing the limits of regional security guarantees and Taliban governance.

The Return of Insurgency in Central Asia

A series of cross-border incidents along the Afghanistan–Tajikistan frontier has raised fears of a renewed insurgent threat in Central Asia. As militant networks regroup in northern Afghanistan, regional governments are questioning long-held assumptions about Taliban governance, Russian security guarantees and the durability of the post-Soviet order.

Read More »
Is an Islamic NATO emerging? Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia explore a trilateral defense pact reshaping Middle East and South Asian security.

Toward an Islamic NATO?

In a rapidly fragmenting global order, Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia are exploring a trilateral defense arrangement that could redefine regional security architectures. Often dubbed an Islamic NATO, the proposed pact reflects a broader shift by middle powers toward strategic autonomy as US security guarantees wane. This convergence signals the merging of Middle Eastern and South Asian strategic theaters into a single geopolitical map.

Read More »
Examining how superpower dominance has eroded international law, turning the rules-based order into a tool of hegemony.

The Hegemon’s Gavel

International law was never truly independent. Once the guarantor of the system breaks the rules, the law becomes a tool for power, not principle.

Read More »