Nepal’s National Assembly Passes Media Council Bill Amidst Criticism

Nepal's National Assembly passes Media Council Bill 2080, sparking concerns over government influence on media. [Image via Kathmandu Post]

The Nepal’s National Assembly passed the ‘Media Council Bill 2080’ in its meeting on Monday, despite significant objections from media professionals. The bill, which includes a provision for the council’s chairperson to be appointed by the government, aims to replace the existing Press Council of Nepal with a new body called the Media Council Nepal.

While some aspects of the bill were modified following discussions, the key provision of having a government-appointed chairperson remains unchanged. Critics have argued that this provision could place the council under government influence, undermining its independence.

Rajendra Laxmi Gaire, a member of the National Assembly, expressed concerns about the government’s control over the council’s leadership, calling for the removal of the provision that allows the government to appoint the chairperson. However, the majority of members voted in favour of retaining the existing structure.

Also See: Nepal Raises Mount Everest Permit Fees for First Time in Nearly a Decade by 35%

Minister for Communications and Information Technology, Prithvi Subba Gurung, claimed that the Media Council Bill had been through thorough discussions within the committee of Nepal’s National Assembly and called for the passage of the bill by consensus.

Under the new bill, the Media Council will have a chairperson and 11 members, including representatives from the Ministry of Communications, the Nepal Press Union, and other media stakeholders. The council will be tasked with regulating media conduct, advising the government on media policy, and ensuring compliance with media ethics.

One of the bill’s most contentious provisions, however, concerns the criteria for selecting the chairperson. The bill stipulates that the chairperson must be a person with qualifications equivalent to a Supreme Court judge. Despite this, critics argue that the government’s involvement in the selection process could limit the council’s independence.

Moreover, the bill includes a clause that mandates media owners to disclose their sources of income and investments, with a requirement to include a disclaimer in any news stories related to their businesses.

While the bill removes many of the more contentious provisions proposed in an earlier draft, such as fines and prison sentences for publishing content deemed offensive, media professionals remain sceptical. Suresh Acharya, former president of the Federation of Nepali Journalists, criticised the bill for not addressing their concerns regarding the government’s oversight of the council.

This news is sourced from Kathmandu Post and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »