Lingering Impact of Tariffs of Trump on Global Trade Relations

Tariffs of Trump on China, Mexico, and Canada reshaped global trade, creating lasting economic and diplomatic impacts. [Image via AP]

The tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump on China, Mexico, and Canada marked a significant shift in global trade policies. These trade wars were not only economic standoffs but also had long-term consequences that continue to shape international relations and trade agreements.

Trump’s strategy aimed to address what he viewed as unfair trade practices, particularly from China, which led to the imposition of tariffs worth billions of dollars. These tariffs, meant to reduce the trade deficit, were initially successful in creating a trade agreement between the US and China but also led to retaliatory tariffs from China on American goods. Similarly, Mexico and Canada were subject to steep tariffs on steel and aluminum, which further fueled tensions. While the tariffs were intended to protect American industries, they also led to higher costs for consumers and disrupted global supply chains.

Also See: Trade War Looms as Trump Introduces 10% Tariff on Chinese Goods

The tariffs were part of Trump’s broader “America First” policy, designed to prioritize US industries and reduce trade deficits with major trading partners. While the tariffs generated revenue for the US government, they sparked fierce opposition from various sectors, especially agriculture and manufacturing, which faced negative repercussions. The trade wars resulted in significant economic shifts, both for the US and its trading partners.

While Trump’s administration negotiated trade deals such as the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to replace NAFTA, the broader impact of his tariffs is still being felt today. These policies (in particular the tariffs by Donald Trump) continue to influence global trade dynamics, with countries now reconsidering how they engage with the US. Ultimately, the legacy of these trade wars presents ongoing challenges for international diplomacy and economic cooperation.

This news is sourced from Indian Express and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »