Iran Willing for Indirect Talks but Rejects Trump’s Pressure

Iran's FM Abbas Araqchi rules out direct U.S. talks, citing pressure tactics, while reaffirming Iran's defense readiness. [Image via Islamic Republic News Agency]

Tehran – Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has once again dismissed any direct talks with the United States (U.S.), saying that the so-called “maximum pressure campaign” and repeated threats against Iran make it impossible to engage in negotiations with Washington.

“This is our definite and clear policy, and until there is a fundamental change in the U.S. approach toward the Islamic Republic and the people of Iran, no direct talks will take place,” Araqchi told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting of the Red Crescent Society in Tehran on Monday.

He said that the way to indirect channels is open and that Iran will convey its messages through indirect means.

“Our goal and mission is to ensure the national interests and security, which, we will never compromise” the top diplomat emphasized.

 He added that the current U.S. policies, accusations, and awful demands make it impossible to engage with direct negotiations.

Also See: Trump’s Offer Of Talks With Iran Aims To Avoid Military Action, US Envoy Says

Elsewhere in his remarks, Araqchi hinted about enemy plots but said that no one dares to invade Iran as it is fully prepared for any scenario.

“I am sure no one will even think of attacking Iran because they are familiar with its consequences and know that various sectors, including the armed forces, relief personnel, the government and the people are all in full readiness,”, he specified.

The foreign minister referred to his conversation with the media a few days and said that he would like to say once again that “there will be no war because we are fully prepared for this situation.”

This news is sourced from Islamic Republic News Agency and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »