Iran Willing for Indirect Talks but Rejects Trump’s Pressure

Iran's FM Abbas Araqchi rules out direct U.S. talks, citing pressure tactics, while reaffirming Iran's defense readiness. [Image via Islamic Republic News Agency]

Tehran – Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has once again dismissed any direct talks with the United States (U.S.), saying that the so-called “maximum pressure campaign” and repeated threats against Iran make it impossible to engage in negotiations with Washington.

“This is our definite and clear policy, and until there is a fundamental change in the U.S. approach toward the Islamic Republic and the people of Iran, no direct talks will take place,” Araqchi told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting of the Red Crescent Society in Tehran on Monday.

He said that the way to indirect channels is open and that Iran will convey its messages through indirect means.

“Our goal and mission is to ensure the national interests and security, which, we will never compromise” the top diplomat emphasized.

 He added that the current U.S. policies, accusations, and awful demands make it impossible to engage with direct negotiations.

Also See: Trump’s Offer Of Talks With Iran Aims To Avoid Military Action, US Envoy Says

Elsewhere in his remarks, Araqchi hinted about enemy plots but said that no one dares to invade Iran as it is fully prepared for any scenario.

“I am sure no one will even think of attacking Iran because they are familiar with its consequences and know that various sectors, including the armed forces, relief personnel, the government and the people are all in full readiness,”, he specified.

The foreign minister referred to his conversation with the media a few days and said that he would like to say once again that “there will be no war because we are fully prepared for this situation.”

This news is sourced from Islamic Republic News Agency and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical examination of how selective activism, misinformation, and glorification of militancy are weaponized to portray Pakistan as a colonial aggressor, undermining state legitimacy and security.

Playing the Victim While Undermining the State

The case of Imaan Mazari highlights a troubling pattern where deliberate misrepresentation of Pakistan as an occupying or genocidal state is framed as dissent, while rhetoric that normalizes violence is shielded behind the language of human rights.

Read More »
Al Jazeera’s reporting on Pakistan

Al Jazeera and Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Narrative

Al Jazeera consistently frames terrorist attacks in Pakistan as political incidents, downplaying violence against civilians and misrepresenting Pakistan’s security operations. This commentary exposes the editorial bias and its implications for public understanding and international perception.

Read More »