Iran Willing for Indirect Talks but Rejects Trump’s Pressure

Iran's FM Abbas Araqchi rules out direct U.S. talks, citing pressure tactics, while reaffirming Iran's defense readiness. [Image via Islamic Republic News Agency]

Tehran – Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has once again dismissed any direct talks with the United States (U.S.), saying that the so-called “maximum pressure campaign” and repeated threats against Iran make it impossible to engage in negotiations with Washington.

“This is our definite and clear policy, and until there is a fundamental change in the U.S. approach toward the Islamic Republic and the people of Iran, no direct talks will take place,” Araqchi told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting of the Red Crescent Society in Tehran on Monday.

He said that the way to indirect channels is open and that Iran will convey its messages through indirect means.

“Our goal and mission is to ensure the national interests and security, which, we will never compromise” the top diplomat emphasized.

 He added that the current U.S. policies, accusations, and awful demands make it impossible to engage with direct negotiations.

Also See: Trump’s Offer Of Talks With Iran Aims To Avoid Military Action, US Envoy Says

Elsewhere in his remarks, Araqchi hinted about enemy plots but said that no one dares to invade Iran as it is fully prepared for any scenario.

“I am sure no one will even think of attacking Iran because they are familiar with its consequences and know that various sectors, including the armed forces, relief personnel, the government and the people are all in full readiness,”, he specified.

The foreign minister referred to his conversation with the media a few days and said that he would like to say once again that “there will be no war because we are fully prepared for this situation.”

This news is sourced from Islamic Republic News Agency and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »