Indo-Pacific Strategy; Can India Depend on the US?

The Indo-US ties have gradually increased over the last few years. This came as a result of America’s ‘ Indo-Pacific’ strategy.

After Washington awarded New Delhi the special status of \”Major Defense Partner\” in 2016, the US-India relationship has exceeded. Since then, India has emerged as one of the most powerful countries in the US-led Quad. The Quad is one of the many components of the US\’s Indo-Pacific strategy. It is an evolving coalition that many analysts fear is based solely on its members\’ ability to contain China.

The United States has had a very reliable ally in India. However,  American\’s Indo-Pacific conduct with India suggests otherwise. What some observers label as Washington\’s coercion, New Delhi cut some of its economic relations with Beijing. This included the investments in technical realms, and refusal to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) last November.

America\’s Duality:

India and China also came to blows in Galway valley last summer. Many observers called India’s action a gesture to please the USA.

Despite Indian reiteration of their commitment, the US depicts a different picture. America continues to pressure India despite the latter proving its reliability time and again. The coerce attitude America plays towards India to achieve its Indo-Pacific goals is evident.

The United States\’ attempts to place sanctions on India for procurement of Russia\’s S-400  systems under the \”Countering America\’s Adversaries By Sanctions Act\” (CAATSA). Secondly, the US Navy\’s disruptive \”freedom of navigation activity\” (FONOP) in India\’s exclusive economic zone on April 7. These underpin a duality on behalf of Americans.

India itself supported FONOP when it was employed against China in the South China sea.

A time for India\’s Redressal of the Indo-Pacific Strategy:

Keeping in view US provocations and their rationale.  This is an excellent time for India to rebalance its foreign policy. As this year\’s BRICS chair, India has the opportunity to address prior disputes and misperceptions among itself, China, and Russia. The USA sowed these misperceptions for its divide and rule plan in its indo-pacific strategy.

 

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »