India’s Withdrawal of Transshipment Facility Impacts Bangladesh Exports

India ends transshipment facility for Bangladesh exports via land borders, citing congestion and trade disruptions. [Image via Bangla Tribune]

India has decided to discontinue the transshipment facility for Bangladesh’s export cargo to third countries—such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar—via its land borders.

In a recent notification issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on Tuesday, the Indian government announced the immediate cancellation of a previous circular dated June 29, 2020.

That circular had permitted export goods from Bangladesh to be transported to third countries through Indian Land Customs Stations (LCSs) to ports or airports, using containers or sealed trucks.

A statement from India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed the withdrawal of the transshipment facility, citing the growing congestion at Indian airports and ports. “The transshipment facility extended to Bangladesh had over a period of time resulted in significant congestion at our airports and ports. Logistical delays and higher costs were hindering our own exports and creating backlogs. The facility, therefore, has been withdrawn with effect from April 8, 2025. To clarify, these measures do not impact Bangladesh exports to Nepal or Bhutan transiting through Indian territory.”

This policy reversal is likely to affect the flow of Bangladesh’s ready-made garment exports through Indian gateways, especially at Indira Gandhi International Airport in New Delhi, which handles a substantial volume of such shipments.

The suspension is expected to hinder Bangladesh’s trade logistics, particularly with neighboring nations like Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar, which depend heavily on Indian transport infrastructure for international commerce. The earlier arrangement had been beneficial in reducing both delivery time and shipping costs.

Also See: India, Cyber Espionage, and Political Influence: What Canada’s Report Unveils

The Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) of India had been lobbying for the removal of this facility. Since India and Bangladesh are direct rivals in textile exports, eliminating the facility is seen as a step to ease congestion at Indian airports and support domestic exporters, according to AEPC Chairman Sudhir Sekhri.

Ajay Srivastava, founder of the New Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), warned that this decision could bring India’s WTO obligations into question. He highlighted that the WTO’s rules require member countries to guarantee free and uninterrupted transit of goods to and from landlocked nations.

According to Srivastava, Article V of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 ensures such transit rights, prohibiting unnecessary restrictions, delays, or transit-related charges.

India’s apparel exports saw a 3.46% decline year-on-year in January, adding pressure on the sector. Currently, around 20–30 truckloads of Bangladeshi goods enter the air cargo terminal at Delhi’s international airport daily, contributing to overcrowding.

Sekhri also mentioned that disruptions in maritime routes—due to the Red Sea crisis and piracy threats—have prompted exporters to switch from sea to air, further inflating logistics expenses.

This news is sourced from Dhaka Tribune and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »
Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Afghanistan’s recent shift away from Pakistani pharmaceutical imports toward Indian suppliers marks a dangerous transformation of healthcare into a tool of geopolitical signaling. Framed as regulatory reform, this pivot reflects a broader biopolitical strategy in which access to medicine is subordinated to diplomatic recalibration, with profound ethical and humanitarian consequences for an already vulnerable population.

Read More »
The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

Despite consolidating internal control and boosting revenues, the Taliban remain structurally incompatible with the 2025 global Counter-Terrorism Financing regime, as sanctions, militant linkages, and gender persecution block financial reintegration.

Read More »