India’s Withdrawal of Transshipment Facility Impacts Bangladesh Exports

India ends transshipment facility for Bangladesh exports via land borders, citing congestion and trade disruptions. [Image via Bangla Tribune]

India has decided to discontinue the transshipment facility for Bangladesh’s export cargo to third countries—such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar—via its land borders.

In a recent notification issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on Tuesday, the Indian government announced the immediate cancellation of a previous circular dated June 29, 2020.

That circular had permitted export goods from Bangladesh to be transported to third countries through Indian Land Customs Stations (LCSs) to ports or airports, using containers or sealed trucks.

A statement from India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed the withdrawal of the transshipment facility, citing the growing congestion at Indian airports and ports. “The transshipment facility extended to Bangladesh had over a period of time resulted in significant congestion at our airports and ports. Logistical delays and higher costs were hindering our own exports and creating backlogs. The facility, therefore, has been withdrawn with effect from April 8, 2025. To clarify, these measures do not impact Bangladesh exports to Nepal or Bhutan transiting through Indian territory.”

This policy reversal is likely to affect the flow of Bangladesh’s ready-made garment exports through Indian gateways, especially at Indira Gandhi International Airport in New Delhi, which handles a substantial volume of such shipments.

The suspension is expected to hinder Bangladesh’s trade logistics, particularly with neighboring nations like Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar, which depend heavily on Indian transport infrastructure for international commerce. The earlier arrangement had been beneficial in reducing both delivery time and shipping costs.

Also See: India, Cyber Espionage, and Political Influence: What Canada’s Report Unveils

The Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) of India had been lobbying for the removal of this facility. Since India and Bangladesh are direct rivals in textile exports, eliminating the facility is seen as a step to ease congestion at Indian airports and support domestic exporters, according to AEPC Chairman Sudhir Sekhri.

Ajay Srivastava, founder of the New Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), warned that this decision could bring India’s WTO obligations into question. He highlighted that the WTO’s rules require member countries to guarantee free and uninterrupted transit of goods to and from landlocked nations.

According to Srivastava, Article V of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 ensures such transit rights, prohibiting unnecessary restrictions, delays, or transit-related charges.

India’s apparel exports saw a 3.46% decline year-on-year in January, adding pressure on the sector. Currently, around 20–30 truckloads of Bangladeshi goods enter the air cargo terminal at Delhi’s international airport daily, contributing to overcrowding.

Sekhri also mentioned that disruptions in maritime routes—due to the Red Sea crisis and piracy threats—have prompted exporters to switch from sea to air, further inflating logistics expenses.

This news is sourced from Dhaka Tribune and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »