India’s Defense Sector Faces Mounting Challenges Amid Delays and Corruption

India's defense sector faces challenges like jet program delays, corruption, and procurement issues, weakening military readiness.

February 19, 2025: India’s defense sector is confronting a series of critical challenges, including significant delays in indigenous fighter jet programs and persistent issues of corruption, which collectively undermine the nation’s military readiness and strategic positioning.

Operational Shortfalls and Delays

The Indian Air Force (IAF) currently operates 31 fighter squadrons, falling short of the sanctioned strength of 42 squadrons—a benchmark established to ensure robust defense capabilities. This shortfall is particularly concerning given the rapid military advancements of neighboring countries, notably China’s unveiling of its 6th-generation fighter jets and Pakistan’s procurement of the J-35 stealth fighter. These developments accentuate India’s strategic vulnerabilities in the region.

Efforts to modernize the fleet have encountered significant obstacles. The Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program, initiated in 2024, remains years away from its inaugural flight, leaving a critical gap as regional adversaries advance their aerial capabilities. Similarly, the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft, intended to replace the aging MiG-21s, has faced production delays and performance issues. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), responsible for Tejas’s production, has been criticized for its sluggish delivery schedule. In response to these delays, HAL has pledged to expedite deliveries, aiming to supply 16 to 24 Tejas aircraft in the upcoming fiscal year, contingent upon the timely receipt of engines from General Electric.

Also See: Rising Suicide Rates in Indian Armed Forces Raise Alarming Concerns

Corruption and Procurement Challenges

The defense procurement process in India has been marred by corruption scandals, eroding public trust and impeding progress. Notable controversies include the Rafale deal and the AgustaWestland chopper scam, which have highlighted systemic issues within the acquisition framework. Transparency International has assessed corruption in India’s defense procurement as “high,” citing secrecy and low accountability as pervasive problems.

Recent incidents further underscore these challenges. In 2024, aerospace and defense manufacturer Moog agreed to pay $1.7 million to settle allegations that its Indian subsidiary engaged in bribery to secure contracts, exemplifying ongoing ethical breaches within the sector.

Strategic Implications and the Path Forward

India’s defense sector continues to grapple with multifaceted challenges, ranging from technological deficiencies to bureaucratic inefficiencies, which hinder its ability to maintain a competitive edge in the region.

The confluence of operational deficiencies and procurement malpractices poses a substantial threat to India’s defense posture. To address these issues, experts advocate for a comprehensive overhaul of the defense procurement process, emphasizing the need for increased transparency, accountability, and the inclusion of private sector expertise. R. Shankar Raman, CFO of Larsen and Toubro, has called for greater engagement of private domestic companies in defense projects, arguing that reliance on state-owned enterprises and imports hampers efficiency and innovation.

As geopolitical tensions escalate, it is imperative for India to fortify its defense sector through systemic reforms, fostering an environment that encourages indigenous development while upholding the highest standards of integrity and efficiency.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »