India’s Defense Sector Faces Mounting Challenges Amid Delays and Corruption

India's defense sector faces challenges like jet program delays, corruption, and procurement issues, weakening military readiness.

February 19, 2025: India’s defense sector is confronting a series of critical challenges, including significant delays in indigenous fighter jet programs and persistent issues of corruption, which collectively undermine the nation’s military readiness and strategic positioning.

Operational Shortfalls and Delays

The Indian Air Force (IAF) currently operates 31 fighter squadrons, falling short of the sanctioned strength of 42 squadrons—a benchmark established to ensure robust defense capabilities. This shortfall is particularly concerning given the rapid military advancements of neighboring countries, notably China’s unveiling of its 6th-generation fighter jets and Pakistan’s procurement of the J-35 stealth fighter. These developments accentuate India’s strategic vulnerabilities in the region.

Efforts to modernize the fleet have encountered significant obstacles. The Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program, initiated in 2024, remains years away from its inaugural flight, leaving a critical gap as regional adversaries advance their aerial capabilities. Similarly, the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft, intended to replace the aging MiG-21s, has faced production delays and performance issues. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), responsible for Tejas’s production, has been criticized for its sluggish delivery schedule. In response to these delays, HAL has pledged to expedite deliveries, aiming to supply 16 to 24 Tejas aircraft in the upcoming fiscal year, contingent upon the timely receipt of engines from General Electric.

Also See: Rising Suicide Rates in Indian Armed Forces Raise Alarming Concerns

Corruption and Procurement Challenges

The defense procurement process in India has been marred by corruption scandals, eroding public trust and impeding progress. Notable controversies include the Rafale deal and the AgustaWestland chopper scam, which have highlighted systemic issues within the acquisition framework. Transparency International has assessed corruption in India’s defense procurement as “high,” citing secrecy and low accountability as pervasive problems.

Recent incidents further underscore these challenges. In 2024, aerospace and defense manufacturer Moog agreed to pay $1.7 million to settle allegations that its Indian subsidiary engaged in bribery to secure contracts, exemplifying ongoing ethical breaches within the sector.

Strategic Implications and the Path Forward

India’s defense sector continues to grapple with multifaceted challenges, ranging from technological deficiencies to bureaucratic inefficiencies, which hinder its ability to maintain a competitive edge in the region.

The confluence of operational deficiencies and procurement malpractices poses a substantial threat to India’s defense posture. To address these issues, experts advocate for a comprehensive overhaul of the defense procurement process, emphasizing the need for increased transparency, accountability, and the inclusion of private sector expertise. R. Shankar Raman, CFO of Larsen and Toubro, has called for greater engagement of private domestic companies in defense projects, arguing that reliance on state-owned enterprises and imports hampers efficiency and innovation.

As geopolitical tensions escalate, it is imperative for India to fortify its defense sector through systemic reforms, fostering an environment that encourages indigenous development while upholding the highest standards of integrity and efficiency.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »