India-US Visa Policies: Trump Expels Us, Modi Funds Him—Where Does India Stand?

As India-US visa policies tighten, Indian students face record rejections, yet India remains a top buyer of U.S. defense equipment. [Image via SAT Creatives]

The fluorescent lights of Indira Gandhi International Airport flickered as the young man dragged his suitcase through the arrival gate, his shoulders slumped under the weight of failure—not his own, but a system that had abandoned him. Just months ago, he had been a graduate student at a prestigious American university, excelling in his coursework, dreaming of a future in Silicon Valley. Then came the visa rejection. No explanation, no warning—just a curt notice ordering him to leave.

He was not alone. Dozens of Indian students on the same flight back from the United States carried similar stories of dashed dreams. Some had invested their families’ life savings into tuition and living expenses, only to be denied the right to complete their education. Others had completed their degrees but found their work visas rejected, forcing them to return to a country that still lacked the infrastructure to absorb their expertise.

Their plight felt personal. I, too, sit in my small room in India, surrounded by books, working toward a dream that now seems increasingly uncertain. From childhood, I was taught that education was the golden key—that intelligence, perseverance, and hard work would unlock doors to the world. I grew up hearing stories of Indian minds shaping Silicon Valley, leading National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and revolutionizing medicine, technology, and business. The United States, I was told, was the land of opportunity.

But what happens when that door is slammed shut?

Also See: The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC): Reality or Myth?

The Reality of India-US Visa Policies and Immigration Challenges

The United States has long benefited from Indian talent, yet its immigration policies have increasingly turned against the very professionals and students who contribute to its economy. Under the Trump administration, visa restrictions tightened drastically. The denial rate for new H-1B petitions, the primary work visa for skilled Indian professionals, rose from 6% in 2015 to a staggering 24% in 2018. Even renewals, once considered routine, faced growing scrutiny, with rejection rates increasing from 3% to 12% in the same period as per the American Immigration Council.

Students were not spared either. In 2023, the U.S. State Department rejected 36% of international student visa applications—the highest rejection rate on record as cited by the Cato Institute. Many Indian students, after enduring rigorous academic competition and investing thousands of dollars, found themselves facing sudden and inexplicable denials. Some were even deported mid-semester, their lives turned upside down overnight.

Despite these policy shifts, India’s response has been largely passive. While thousands of Indian students and professionals struggle to secure their place in the U.S., the Indian government continues to deepen its financial commitments to Washington—particularly through multi-billion-dollar defense deals.

India’s Defense Expenditure: A Question of Priorities

India has emerged as one of the largest buyers of U.S. defense equipment. Over the past two decades, India has purchased more than $20 billion worth of American military hardware, including fighter jets, drones, and missile systems. These transactions are justified in the name of national security, but they raise important questions.

Should a nation facing increasing restrictions on its citizens abroad continue to make such substantial financial commitments to the same country imposing these restrictions? The irony is stark. India spends billions to strengthen its strategic ties with the United States, yet its brightest minds are increasingly shut out from the very institutions and industries that once welcomed them. Instead of blindly pouring money into foreign defense contracts, should India not reallocate some of these funds to bolster its own education, research, and technology sectors?

A Strategic Shift: Investing in India’s Own Potential

The solution is not isolationism, but strategic recalibration. India has the potential to develop its own world-class universities, research centers, and technology hubs that can reduce dependence on foreign institutions. If India prioritizes investment in higher education and innovation, it can retain its brightest minds instead of losing them to countries that, over time, have made their stay more difficult.

At the same time, India must leverage its economic and strategic position to negotiate better terms for its students and professionals. Trade agreements and diplomatic engagements should ensure that Indian talent is valued and protected in international markets. Other major economies, including China and European nations, actively advocate for their students and professionals—India should do the same.

A Nation That Demands Respect

A country’s global standing is not just defined by economic strength or military purchases but by how it safeguards the interests of its people. India has long been a contributor to global innovation and development. It must now take steps to ensure that its students and professionals are not treated as dispensable but as valued partners in the international economy.

India is not just a customer in the global market—it is a nation of immense talent and potential. It must demand respect, not just in economic transactions but in how its people are treated abroad.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Amolik Yashraj

Amolik Yashraj

Amolik Yashraj is a Class 12 CBSE student at Usha Martin World School, Patna, Bihar, India, with a keen interest in research and academics. He founded MarketTrends, a chess community, and has mentored students in research writing.

Recent

Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban break commitments, harbor terrorists, exclude women and minorities, and defy international agreements.

Broken Promises, Renewed Threats: Time to Hold TTA Accountable

Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban have broken key commitments: 5,000 released prisoners returned to combat, 89% of government posts are held by Pashtuns, and women remain barred from education and work. Afghan soil hosts 6,000–6,500 TTP and Al-Qaeda fighters, with TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud receiving $43,000/month. Pakistan has neutralized 267 Afghan terrorists in 2025, while 58 terrorist camps operate under Taliban knowledge. Despite the US aid, compliance is minimal. International recognition and support must now be tied to verifiable reforms to prevent further regional instability.

Read More »
The Istanbul dialogue between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban collapsed over the TTP issue, exposing the limits of regional diplomacy and mediation.

The Istanbul Dialogue: How the Taliban’s Intransigence Doomed Diplomacy

The highly anticipated Istanbul dialogue, facilitated by Turkey and Qatar, has ended in deadlock. The Taliban’s refusal to act against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and their introduction of provocative counter-demands have effectively derailed the diplomatic process, underscoring the ideological rigidity driving Kabul’s foreign policy.

Read More »
Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s return in 2021 brought rapid consolidation of power, but also the revival of a historical flaw. By concentrating authority in the hands of southern Pashtun elites, the Taliban have recreated the core–periphery divide that has destabilized every Afghan regime since the 19th century. This hyper-centralization, rooted in ethnic exclusivity and Kandahar dominance, risks a repeat of past collapses as non-Pashtun regions turn toward functional autonomy.

Read More »
Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments

Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments

Nearly three years after seizing power, the Taliban’s systematic violation of their international commitments under the 2020 Doha Accord has transformed Afghanistan into a sanctuary for terrorism, entrenched an autocratic regime, and institutionalized gender apartheid. Beyond moral failure, this deceit poses a grave threat to regional stability, international counterterrorism efforts, and the credibility of global diplomacy. Holding the regime accountable is now a strategic necessity, not a choice.

Read More »
Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat

Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat

On November 6, 1947, one of South Asia’s earliest genocides unfolded in Jammu, where hundreds of thousands of Muslims were massacred or forced to flee. Yet, unlike other global tragedies, this atrocity remains buried in silence. The Jammu Genocide not only reshaped the region’s demography but laid the foundation for India’s ongoing campaign of identity erasure in Kashmir. From demographic engineering to cultural censorship, the spirit of Kashmiriyat continues to face systematic annihilation.

Read More »