India Summons Bangladesh’s Top Diplomat, Nurul Islam

India and Bangladesh exchange diplomatic summons, with Nurul Islam summoned by India amid rising border tensions over fencing. [Image via the Hills Times]

Amid rising tensions along the India-Bangladesh border, India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) summoned Nurul Islam, Bangladesh’s Deputy High Commissioner to India, on Tuesday. The move came just a day after Bangladesh’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned Pranay Verma, India’s High Commissioner to Dhaka, to address concerns over alleged border incursions and fencing disputes.

Also See: Bangladesh Summons Indian HC Pranay Verma Over Border Fence Construction

Escalating Border Disputes

The recent diplomatic exchanges mark a sharp escalation in border-related disputes between the two nations. Bangladesh has raised objections to India’s construction of fences in disputed areas, claiming it violates agreements meant to maintain peace and respect sovereignty.

India, however, maintains that its border fencing projects aim to enhance security and combat illegal activities, such as smuggling and unauthorized crossings. Despite these justifications, Dhaka insists that certain activities infringe on the terms of the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement (LBA), a historic accord that resolved long-standing territorial disputes between the neighbors.

Diplomatic Back-and-Forth

In its discussions with Pranay Verma, Bangladesh reportedly urged India to adhere to treaty commitments and respect agreed-upon border demarcations. The MEA’s subsequent summoning of Nurul Islam indicates counter-concerns of India over what it views as provocative actions by Bangladesh or a lack of cooperation on border management issues.

While both nations have avoided direct public accusations, analysts note that the rapid sequence of diplomatic summonses reflects growing frustration on both sides.

Strained Relations or Regional Realignment?

The border tensions come at a delicate time for India-Bangladesh relations. Despite strong cooperation in trade, security, and connectivity in recent years, the latest developments threaten to undermine mutual trust.

Critics in Dhaka allege that India’s actions reflect hegemonic tendencies that disregard the sovereignty of smaller neighbors, while some in New Delhi argue that Bangladesh’s border policies have contributed to instability.

“Actions like unilateral fencing or encroachments undermine the spirit of cooperation and could lead to regional instability,” a Bangladeshi official stated on condition of anonymity.

Indian officials, meanwhile, emphasized the need to address border security as a shared responsibility, stressing that illegal activities on both sides pose a challenge to law enforcement efforts.

The Need for Dialogue

The 4,096-kilometer India-Bangladesh border is one of the most porous in the world, making it a focal point for disputes over territory and border management. Both nations have long acknowledged the need for diplomatic solutions to avoid escalation.

Observers stress that maintaining the principles of the LBA is crucial to preserving the progress made over decades of cooperation.

As the region watches closely, the recent tensions serve as a reminder of the fragile balance in bilateral ties and the importance of measured diplomacy in resolving disputes. Both nations must now work to prevent the border issue from overshadowing their broader relationship.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »