India leads internet shutdowns

India leads internet shutdowns

Governments are using internet shutdowns as “weapons of control and shields of impunity”, says digital rights watchdog Access and now India leads the global list for the fifth consecutive year with 84 shutdowns, 49 of them recorded in Indian-administered Kashmir.

Authorities last year shut down the internet at least 187 times in a record 35 countries – the highest number ever in a single year. India leads the global list with 84 shutdowns, 49 of them recorded in Indian-administered Kashmir.

These were the findings of a report released on Tuesday by digital rights watchdog Access Now and the #KeepItOn coalition, which said governments are using internet shutdowns as “weapons of control and shields of impunity”.

India – labelled “the biggest offender” – led the watchdog’s list for a fifth consecutive year. It was, however, the first time since 2017 that India saw fewer than 100 internet shutdowns, according to the report.

“Authorities disrupted internet access at least 49 times in [Indian-administered] Kashmir due to political instability and violence, including a string of 16 back-to-back orders for three-day-long curfew-style shutdowns in January and February 2022,” the report said.

In 2021, about 80 percent of all shutdowns in India were in the disputed Himalayan region, compared with 58 percent in 2022, it added.

Kashmir is claimed in its entirety by both India and Pakistan, who control parts of it. A decades-old popular rebellion against New Delhi’s rule on the Indian side has seen one of the world’s highest deployments of security forces in the region.

Since 2019 when India’s right-wing government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, scrapped Indian-administered Kashmir’s special status, the region has witnessed an unprecedented crackdown on residents and the imposition of laws and policies which critics say are aimed at marginalizing and oppressing the country’s only Muslim-majority region.

Srinivas Kodali, digital rights activist and researcher with the Free Software Movement of India, told Al Jazeera that internet shutdowns are happening in India because the government can afford to block Indian-administered Kashmir out.

“It is a form of repression. The government is telling people that unless you toe the line, you will not be allowed to be part of a normal world,” he said.

Kodali said internet shutdowns are also a form of “economic blockade”.

“We have heard so many stories about how shutting down the internet in Kashmir takes away people’s right from taking part in any trade and commerce online. It is not just about speech, it is also economic in nature. If it was just about the speech, the government has enough censorship powers,” he said.

“So, the suppression that the government is doing with the internet in India is not just a form of censorship but also a form of economic blockade. It hurts people badly. It is not just that people are being censored and silenced, it affects them economically.”

The other Indian regions mentioned in the Access Now report included the West Bengal (7) and Rajasthan (12) states – both governed by political parties opposed to Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The authorities in those states responded to “protests, communal violence, and exams with disruptions that impacted the daily lives of millions of people for hundreds of hours in 2022,” said the report.

Other nations that saw a large number of internet shutdowns included Iran, Myanmar, Russia and Ethiopia.

“In 2022, under authoritarian regimes and in democracies, powermongers accelerated their use of these callous tactics, disrupting the internet to fuel their agendas of oppression – manipulating narratives, silencing voices and ensuring cover for their own acts of violence and abuse,” said Felicia Anthonio, the #KeepItOn campaign manager at Access Now, in a statement.

Source: Al Jazeera

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

As Bihar votes, Modi’s militarised politics faces its toughest test yet—will voters reject war rhetoric for real issues like jobs and poverty?

Bihar Should Reject Modi’s War Politics

Bihar’s election is shaping up as a test of Modi’s war-driven politics. With rising discontent over unemployment and poor governance, voters may choose to look past jingoism and focus on the real issues that shape their daily lives.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace represents a major shift from fraternal idealism to strategic realism in South Asia’s volatile security landscape. Rooted in classical realist thought, the doctrine emphasizes verification over trust, deterrence over sentiment, and conditional diplomacy over blind faith. Confronting the twin challenges of cross-border militancy and Indian-backed proxy networks in Afghanistan, Islamabad now seeks peace that is enforceable, monitored, and verifiable, anchoring regional stability on responsibility, not rhetoric.

Read More »
When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »