Imran Khan, Malik Riaz Await Verdict in £190 Million Al-Qadir Trust Case

The verdict in the £190 million Al-Qadir Trust case involving Imran Khan and Malik Riaz is expected on January 13.

Islamabad, Pakistan—January 12, 2025: The accountability court in Islamabad is expected to deliver its Al-Qadir Trust Case verdict on January 13, 2025, in the highly anticipated £190 million (approximately 41 billion PKR) scandal case involving former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi. The case has sparked intense scrutiny, not just for its financial magnitude but also for the involvement of real estate magnate Malik Riaz of Bahria Town.

The trial has already seen over 100 hearings. Significant evidence and witness testimony suggest corruption, misuse of authority, and personal gain. The court proceedings have been delayed due to Judge Nasser Javed Rana’s leave, but the final ruling is expected tomorrow.

The £190 Million Quid-Pro-Quo Deal

This case involves the £190 million that was laundered to the United Kingdom and subsequently recovered by the National Crime Agency (NCA). Rather than being returned to Pakistan’s Treasury, the money was allegedly funneled back to Malik Riaz, with the funds being used to settle a separate scandal worth PKR 465 billion involving Bahria Town’s illegal land acquisitions.

This entire transaction initially presented as a state-to-state deal between the UK and Pakistan, has now come under heavy scrutiny. Key evidence suggests that the funds were instead diverted to Bahria Town and used to resolve Malik Riaz’s ongoing legal issues, with legal cover provided by routing the money through the Supreme Court’s bank account.

The involvement of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in securing land deals in exchange for facilitating the transfer of the £190 million has raised further questions about their motives. 458 Kanal of land for Al-Qadir University and another 240 Kanal in Mohra, Islamabad, are believed to have been secured as part of this quid-pro-quo arrangement.

Legal Proceedings and Allegations Against Imran Khan

In a significant development, the Islamabad High Court had earlier dismissed the bail plea of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in the case, and ordered the trial court to hear the case further. On February 27, 2024, charges were formally leveled against the former Prime Minister and his wife. The investigation has revealed that the £190 million was actually state money but was unlawfully returned to Malik Riaz.

Furthermore, the 2019 deal between Malik Riaz and Imran Khan’s government was reportedly negotiated with the aim of settling Bahria Town’s fine of PKR 460 billion for illegal land encroachments. The National Crime Agency had also imposed a $200 million fine on Malik Riaz in the UK, which was subsequently agreed to be returned to Pakistan.

At the time, Shahzad Akbar, who was Khan’s special advisor, publicly stated that no legal action would be taken due to the involvement of the UK government in the matter. A press release from the PM Office revealed that the Assets Recovery Unit (ARU) had facilitated the return of £190 million through a settlement, which was meant to be deposited in Pakistan’s accounts, not diverted for personal gain.

Malik Riaz’s Role and the Al-Qadir Trust

In addition to this, the Al-Qadir Trust case has emerged from an earlier Supreme Court case in which Malik Riaz was implicated in illegal land deals. The settlement reached between Khan and Malik Riaz allegedly provided the latter with significant land benefits, particularly in relation to Al-Qadir University, which is managed by Bushra Bibi.

What to Expect from the Al Qadir Trust Verdict

Given the mounting evidence, the case appears to be a clear instance of corruption and misuse of authority. The £190 million is now viewed by legal experts as public money, and Khan’s involvement in its diversion to Malik Riaz suggests that personal gain was the primary motive.

Critics argue that Imran Khan used his religious and political influence to legitimize his kickback scheme, with Bushra Bibi reportedly serving as a trustee in the Al-Qadir University project, raising further concerns about corruption at the highest levels.

The political fallout has been significant, with opponents accusing Khan of exploiting his position for personal gain. The case has polarized public opinion, with Imran Khan’s supporters claiming that the charges are politically motivated, while others assert that this case reveals a troubling pattern of corruption disguised as religion.

As the court prepares to deliver its final judgment on January 13, it remains to be seen what consequences Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi will face. The legal ramifications of this case could be severe, and the verdict is likely to send a strong message about the need for accountability in Pakistan’s political system.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »