Imran Khan, Malik Riaz Await Verdict in £190 Million Al-Qadir Trust Case

The verdict in the £190 million Al-Qadir Trust case involving Imran Khan and Malik Riaz is expected on January 13.

Islamabad, Pakistan—January 12, 2025: The accountability court in Islamabad is expected to deliver its Al-Qadir Trust Case verdict on January 13, 2025, in the highly anticipated £190 million (approximately 41 billion PKR) scandal case involving former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi. The case has sparked intense scrutiny, not just for its financial magnitude but also for the involvement of real estate magnate Malik Riaz of Bahria Town.

The trial has already seen over 100 hearings. Significant evidence and witness testimony suggest corruption, misuse of authority, and personal gain. The court proceedings have been delayed due to Judge Nasser Javed Rana’s leave, but the final ruling is expected tomorrow.

The £190 Million Quid-Pro-Quo Deal

This case involves the £190 million that was laundered to the United Kingdom and subsequently recovered by the National Crime Agency (NCA). Rather than being returned to Pakistan’s Treasury, the money was allegedly funneled back to Malik Riaz, with the funds being used to settle a separate scandal worth PKR 465 billion involving Bahria Town’s illegal land acquisitions.

This entire transaction initially presented as a state-to-state deal between the UK and Pakistan, has now come under heavy scrutiny. Key evidence suggests that the funds were instead diverted to Bahria Town and used to resolve Malik Riaz’s ongoing legal issues, with legal cover provided by routing the money through the Supreme Court’s bank account.

The involvement of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in securing land deals in exchange for facilitating the transfer of the £190 million has raised further questions about their motives. 458 Kanal of land for Al-Qadir University and another 240 Kanal in Mohra, Islamabad, are believed to have been secured as part of this quid-pro-quo arrangement.

Legal Proceedings and Allegations Against Imran Khan

In a significant development, the Islamabad High Court had earlier dismissed the bail plea of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in the case, and ordered the trial court to hear the case further. On February 27, 2024, charges were formally leveled against the former Prime Minister and his wife. The investigation has revealed that the £190 million was actually state money but was unlawfully returned to Malik Riaz.

Furthermore, the 2019 deal between Malik Riaz and Imran Khan’s government was reportedly negotiated with the aim of settling Bahria Town’s fine of PKR 460 billion for illegal land encroachments. The National Crime Agency had also imposed a $200 million fine on Malik Riaz in the UK, which was subsequently agreed to be returned to Pakistan.

At the time, Shahzad Akbar, who was Khan’s special advisor, publicly stated that no legal action would be taken due to the involvement of the UK government in the matter. A press release from the PM Office revealed that the Assets Recovery Unit (ARU) had facilitated the return of £190 million through a settlement, which was meant to be deposited in Pakistan’s accounts, not diverted for personal gain.

Malik Riaz’s Role and the Al-Qadir Trust

In addition to this, the Al-Qadir Trust case has emerged from an earlier Supreme Court case in which Malik Riaz was implicated in illegal land deals. The settlement reached between Khan and Malik Riaz allegedly provided the latter with significant land benefits, particularly in relation to Al-Qadir University, which is managed by Bushra Bibi.

What to Expect from the Al Qadir Trust Verdict

Given the mounting evidence, the case appears to be a clear instance of corruption and misuse of authority. The £190 million is now viewed by legal experts as public money, and Khan’s involvement in its diversion to Malik Riaz suggests that personal gain was the primary motive.

Critics argue that Imran Khan used his religious and political influence to legitimize his kickback scheme, with Bushra Bibi reportedly serving as a trustee in the Al-Qadir University project, raising further concerns about corruption at the highest levels.

The political fallout has been significant, with opponents accusing Khan of exploiting his position for personal gain. The case has polarized public opinion, with Imran Khan’s supporters claiming that the charges are politically motivated, while others assert that this case reveals a troubling pattern of corruption disguised as religion.

As the court prepares to deliver its final judgment on January 13, it remains to be seen what consequences Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi will face. The legal ramifications of this case could be severe, and the verdict is likely to send a strong message about the need for accountability in Pakistan’s political system.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »