How Media Moguls Shape the Narrative Against the Pakistani Diaspora

Explore how media moguls like Musk and Zuckerberg shape narratives, impacting truth and the Pakistani diaspora in the UK. [Image via Mr Wallpaper.com]

What happens when truth is molded by algorithms and narratives are shaped by the whims of billionaires? When media moguls like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Donald Trump dominate the digital stage, where does accountability go? Do we continue to accept the crafted narratives fed to us, or do we dare to question them? For the Pakistani diaspora in the UK, a community already burdened by unfair stereotypes, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Is the Pakistani diaspora merely a pawn in a larger game of political theater? And what happens when these narratives are crafted not by facts, but by the unchecked power of social media giants? Let’s pull back the curtain and see what’s really happening behind the scenes of these global disinformation machines.

In her incisive piece, “Trump, Musk and Zuckerberg have declared war on facts and truth. The pushback must start now”, Emily Bell outlines a critical transformation of media platforms under the influence of right-wing authoritarianism, with figures like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Donald Trump becoming central to a global narrative shift. However, while the article focuses on the dismantling of accountability mechanisms in the digital world, it’s essential to look at how these dynamics extend beyond Silicon Valley to affect global diaspora communities, particularly the Pakistani diaspora in the UK. The growing narrative of “us versus them” driven by powerful media moguls is a strategy with wider implications, and it is high time we dissect the double standards that shape these conversations.

The Pakistani Diaspora: A Minority Facing a Larger, Unseen Enemy

The Pakistani diaspora in the UK, comprising just 2% of the population, has often been unjustly linked to criminal activities in a way that distorts public perception. It’s worth noting that 85% of those involved in such crimes are actually white Britons, yet the media focus remains disproportionately on smaller communities, including Pakistanis. This is the dangerous framing that leads to a false narrative, one that stokes Islamophobia and racial bias.

Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, in their attempts to cater to populist sentiments and appease authoritarian figures, serve as the unfair prime movers in this campaign. Zuckerberg’s dismantling of Facebook’s third-party fact-checking network, for instance, isn’t just a business decision; it’s a calculated move that erodes accountability and enables the proliferation of disinformation. As Bell rightly points out, platforms like Meta prioritize political power over truth, which has significant consequences for the Pakistani diaspora, whose reputation is at the mercy of such unchecked digital influences.

Geopolitical Strategies and Racialized Narratives

The framing of issues related to grooming gangs in the UK serves as a stark example of how complex social problems are often reduced to racially charged tropes. While it is true that a small segment within any diaspora may act against national interests, the emphasis placed on Muslim communities, particularly Pakistanis, distorts reality. Data shows that the vast majority of grooming gang perpetrators in the UK are from white British backgrounds, yet the media, fueled by powerful digital platforms controlled by media moguls, insists on perpetuating harmful stereotypes about the Pakistani community.

This distortion isn’t accidental. It aligns with broader geopolitical strategies designed to weaken the unity of diaspora communities and tarnish their global reputation. The far-right groups, which benefit from these divisive narratives, find in platforms like Meta and X (formerly Twitter) willing allies. The echo chambers these platforms create amplify racialized rhetoric and contribute to destabilizing social cohesion. This is more than just a local issue; it serves foreign interests that benefit from inflaming societal tensions. Media moguls, with their unchecked influence, play a pivotal role in perpetuating these disinformation cycles.

Also See: Elon Musk’s Grooming Gangs Debate: Is There More Than Meets the Eye

Musk, Zuckerberg, and the Power to Suppress Truth

The core issue lies in how digital platforms have been weaponized to silence critics and manipulate narratives. Musk’s transformation of Twitter into X has been nothing short of a masterclass in turning a platform of free expression into a tool for political warfare. By amplifying right-wing rhetoric, Musk provides a platform to those who seek to destabilize democratic systems, including critics of governments like Pakistan. Whether it’s Pakistani vloggers in the US who openly criticize their home country or foreign governments looking to discredit diaspora communities, Musk’s X facilitates the spread of misinformation without any checks or balances.

Zuckerberg, on the other hand, has prioritized proximity to power over truth. Meta’s shift away from fact-checking in favor of aligning with political figures like Trump is a clear indication of the company’s priorities. The platform, which once claimed to promote unbiased information, now serves as a battleground where political interests trump factual accuracy. For the Pakistani diaspora, this represents a clear and present danger: the potential erosion of their collective narrative through the unchecked spread of disinformation.

Pakistan’s Response: A Call for Unity

Pakistan’s response to these narratives isn’t just about defending its diaspora; it’s about redefining the narrative in a way that exposes the cracks in these sweeping generalizations. While the UK’s media circus often highlights the actions of a small minority within the Pakistani diaspora, it’s telling how the majority—the 98%—are portrayed as a backdrop to the sensationalist, far-right agendas that benefit from such a distorted lens. In reality, the figures behind such campaigns, whether it’s Zuckerberg or Musk, don’t have the best track record when it comes to accountability, and they certainly don’t have the best interests of our communities at heart.

Let’s be clear: the Pakistani diaspora isn’t just an afterthought to be scapegoated at the whims of Silicon Valley moguls or political opportunists. These are individuals who are an integral part of global society, contributing across industries and shaping narratives far beyond the headlines.

So, when Mark Zuckerberg decides to discard fact-checking mechanisms, or Elon Musk weaponizes platforms like X to bash critics, we need to ask, where’s the accountability? It’s not just about truth or misinformation—it’s about control. And as platforms grow more powerful, the rules of the game are changing, often to the detriment of marginalized voices.

The Pakistani state doesn’t shy away from acknowledging that no community is free from flaws—every nation has its dissonant voices. However, to isolate and stereotype an entire population based on the actions of a few, while ignoring the broader societal context, not only perpetuates Islamophobia but serves geopolitical agendas intent on fracturing unity.

We’re not just fighting against baseless accusations; we’re fighting to preserve the dignity and solidarity of the diaspora. In the face of these narratives, Pakistan stands firm. We’re here to remind everyone that the strength of our people lies not in their division, but in their ability to unite and confront these divisive campaigns head-on. And to the naysayers? We’ll be busy reshaping the narrative while you keep digging yourself deeper into the quicksand of disinformation.

Conclusion: Disrupting the Disinformation Cycle

As Bell rightly points out, the window for resisting the powerful forces reshaping the digital landscape is narrow. The Pakistani diaspora, alongside other marginalized communities, must recognize the far-reaching implications of these shifts. Just as Zuckerberg and Musk use their platforms to suppress accountability and spread disinformation, so too must the diaspora fight back—by amplifying facts, supporting fair reporting, and building stronger, unified narratives that resist the distortions propagated by global media moguls.

Ultimately, it is not just about protecting the reputation of the Pakistani community; it is about defending the very notion of truth and accountability in an era where both are under attack. The task ahead is clear: resist the tide of disinformation, uphold public media, and most importantly, enable a collective courage that can weather these manufactured storms.

Haleema Khalid

Haleema Khalid

Haleema Khalid is an Editor and Research Lead at South Asia Times. She holds a Master's degree in Applied Linguistics and a Bachelor's in Social Work. Her research interests include exploring language's impact on society and culture.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »