Governance, Protests, and Identity: Decoding the Crisis in Azad Jammu and Kashmir

South Asia Times X Space explored AJK protests, JAAC’s role, subsidies, governance challenges, and India’s narrative spin.

On October 2, 2025, South Asia Times (SAT) hosted an insightful X Space session on the “Ongoing Protests in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK).” Moderated by Usama Khan, Director SAT, the discussion brought forward perspectives from Farzana Yaqoob, former AJK minister and prominent political leader, and Sardar Sohail Hassan, an AJK-based activist with extensive grassroots exposure.

The dialogue explored the roots of the unrest, the role of the Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), governance challenges, youth mobilisation, and the broader regional implications for Pakistan and Kashmir.

Highlights from Farzana Yaqoob

Government–Funds Debate

Farzana Yaqoob clarified that JAAC has exaggerated the privileges of AJK ministers. While certain benefits exist, the actual funds are lower than those of provincial ministers in Pakistan, and misrepresentation of this issue which works largely on the same mechanism as in Pakistan regarding matters like privileges to ministers has fueled public discontent.

Voter–Leader Relations in AJK

She noted that unlike Pakistan, voter-leader bonds in AJK remain resilient. Rooted in close community ties, high literacy, and a culture of respect and honor, this dynamic sustains strong political engagement across the region which is now fading at hands of both the incompetent political leadership and the malicious elements.

Youth and JAAC’s Role

Madam Farzana Yaqoob emphasized that AJK’s youth are deeply capable and engaged, but some are being misguided by JAAC factions. Violent clashes undermine their credibility and risk delegitimizing their activism. She urged the government to address developmental gaps so that genuine concerns of youth are not exploited.

Legitimacy of Protests

While acknowledging that some grievances are justified, she stressed that not all demands are constitutional or just. The movement risks losing legitimacy if it departs from peaceful and constitutional means.

Governance and External Forces

She highlighted AJK’s weak administrative capacity and shortage of police, just a few thousand for 4 million people. She noted that Pakistani police are deployed at the request of AJK’s government, not imposed externally. Referring to JAAC’s rhetoric on “external forces,” she said these are our own forces and cautioned that both sides must exercise restraint, as casualties, whether in uniform or not, are our people.

Administrative Issues and Stability

She warned that governance shortcomings are being ballooned deliberately, endangering the valley’s stability. The unrest, she said, mirrors the wider playbook in Pakistan where ultra-nationalist groups are backed to create a vacuum between the people and their legitimate representatives.

International Implications

Yaqoob drew attention to how protests in AJK are weaponized internationally. Indian media, including Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, has shifted its narrative, moving from military threats against AJK to suggesting that unrest will “bring AJK to India on its own.” Such framing, she warned, damages Pakistan’s global position by creating a false equivalence with India’s illegal occupation of Kashmir.

Social Harmony

She lamented the rise of abusive and aggressive political behaviour in AJK since 2021, calling it alien to Kashmiri traditions of kinship and peace.

Highlights from Sardar Sohail Hassan

While both the speakers maintained a coordinated and aligned stance upon the subject core, Sardar Sohail Hassan especially highlighted the technicalities lingering under the guise of the mainstream narrative being projected and sold by the questionable credentials of people involved in the protests.

Pakistan’s Subsidy Support

Mr. Sohail Hassan underlined that Pakistan has extended 65 billion rupees in wheat and electricity subsidies, along with additional relief packages, the same Pakistani government they raise the slogans against. Yet, JAAC continues to exploit these issues for agitation rather than seeking genuine resolution.

Acceptance of Demands

He pointed out that of JAAC’s 38 demands, 36 were already accepted by Pakistan’s federal delegation. The two remaining demands require constitutional amendments, which might risks undermining the identity of migrant Kashmiris who sacrificed everything to resettle in AJK.

JAAC’s Composition

Hassan revealed that JAAC’s membership is dominated by vested interests: 17 of its 30 members are traders who received massive subsidies from Pakistan but failed to pass relief to the public, monopolizing benefits. The remaining 13 are ultra-nationalist elements with no genuine public base, raising anti-Pakistan slogans despite AJK’s people being firmly pro-Pakistan.

Compromised Elements

He also cautioned that many JAAC leaders have records of direct or indirect links with external actors, having publicly available records of such links, including Indian agencies. He urged the AJK government to take firm action against such compromised groups.

Shared Perspectives

Both speakers agreed that:

  • JAAC’s agenda is being driven by a mix of trader interests and externally backed ultra-nationalist elements.
  • The protests, while rooted in some real grievances, are being manipulated for political and external purposes.
  • Kashmiri society remains overwhelmingly aligned with Pakistan. They cited Syed Ali Shah Gilani’s lifelong stand against Indian aggression and his vision of Pakistan as the natural home of all Kashmiris as a testament to the enduring bond.

Takeaway

The discussion revealed that AJK’s protests, while emerging from genuine governance challenges, are being exploited by trader lobbies and ultra-nationalist groups with external links. Despite Pakistan’s extensive subsidies and relief support, these contributions are downplayed to fuel unrest.

Speakers concluded that while the government must urgently address administrative shortcomings and meet legitimate demands, it must also firmly counter anti-Pakistan agendas. At its core, Kashmir’s social fabric and political identity remain tied to Pakistan, a bond external actors have repeatedly failed to weaken.

Also See: Syed Ali Shah Gillani: The Ideologue Who Defined Kashmir’s Defiance

WebDesk

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »