France, UK Push for Ukraine Truce as Europe Seeks U.S. Support

Trump hints at a U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal as Europe pushes for a truce, revealing fractures in Western unity over the war. [Image via Reuters]

U.S. President Donald Trump hinted on Monday that a deal to open up Ukraine’s minerals to U.S. investment could still be agreed despite his frustration with Kyiv, as leaders of Europe floated proposals for a truce in Russia’s war with its neighbor.

The Trump administration views such a deal as America’s way of earning back some of the tens of billions of dollars it has given to Ukraine in financial and military aid since Russia invaded three years ago.

But an explosive clash in the Oval Office last week between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy put the potential pact in doubt. When asked on Monday if the deal was dead, Trump said at the White House: “No, I don’t think so.”

Trump described it as a “great deal for us” and said he would give an update on the situation on Tuesday night.

Trump has upended U.S. policy on Ukraine and Russia after taking office in January, adopting a more conciliatory stance towards Moscow that has left Kyiv and European allies wary.

On Monday he again said Zelenskiy should be more appreciative of U.S. support after earlier responding angrily to an Associated Press report quoting Zelenskiy as saying the end of the war is “very, very far away.”

“This is the worst statement that could have been made by Zelenskyy, and America will not put up with it for much longer!” Trump wrote on Truth Social, using an alternative spelling of the Ukrainian leader’s name.

European leaders are processing what some describe as Washington’s biggest policy reversal since World War Two, after Zelenskiy left the White House abruptly on Friday after a public dressing-down by Trump and Vice President JD Vance.

Zelenskiy departed Washington without signing the minerals deal.

“What we need to hear from President Zelenskiy is that he has regret for what happened, he’s ready to sign this minerals deal and that he’s ready to engage in peace talks,” White House national security adviser Mike Waltz told Fox News.

“We’ll see what happens in the next 48 hours, but we are certainly looking to move forward in a positive way.”

Some Republicans have pushed to revive the deal.

Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, co-chair of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Ukraine caucus, said on X that he had spoken to Zelenskiy’s chief of staff and that the minerals deal was to be “signed in short order.”

“We are 100% getting this train back on the tracks,” the Pennsylvania Republican said.

Senate Republican leader John Thune also said he hoped the two sides could get “back on track.”

EUROPE RALLIES AROUND UKRAINE

European countries are rallying around Zelenskiy and trying to hatch a peace plan.

“There are clearly a number of options on the table,” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesman said.

France, Britain and potentially other European countries have offered to send troops to Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire – something Moscow has already rejected – but say they would want support from the U.S., or a “backstop.”

Zelenskiy says a ceasefire must carry explicit security guarantees from the West to ensure that Russia, which holds about 20% of its land, does not attack again. Trump has refused to give any such guarantees.

Starmer hosted European leaders in London on Sunday and said they agreed to draw up a peace plan to present to Washington.

In an interview on his way to the summit, French President Emmanuel Macron raised the possibility of a one-month truce, though there was no immediate public endorsement from allies.

“Such a truce on air, sea and energy infrastructure would allow us to determine whether Russian President Vladimir Putin is acting in good faith when he commits to a truce,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said.

“And that’s when real peace negotiations could start.”

European ground troops would only be deployed to Ukraine in a second phase, Macron told Le Figaro.

Zelenskiy, asked if he was aware of that proposal, told reporters in London: “I’m aware of everything.”

Also See: European Leaders Unite in London, Plan Stronger Military Backing for Kyiv

KREMLIN SEES ‘FRAGMENTATION’ OF THE WEST

Friedrich Merz, the conservative due to become Germany’s chancellor, suggested Friday’s Oval Office argument, in which Zelenskiy was pressed to commit publicly to a diplomatic solution, had been a “manufactured escalation” by the White House.

“We must now show that we are in a position to act independently in Europe,” Merz said.

Privately, and sometimes publicly, European officials are fuming at what they see as a betrayal of Ukraine, which had enjoyed staunch support from Washington since Russia’s invasion.

French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said there had been “two victims” from the Oval Office clash: Ukraine’s security and Europe’s eight-decade alliance with the United States. In the French parliament, he thanked Zelenskiy for standing firm.

But Europeans are also still working to keep the U.S. onside. Peter Mandelson, Britain’s ambassador to the United States, said Ukrainian-U.S. relations needed to be reset, as Trump’s initiative to end the war was “the only show in town.”

Trump spoke by phone with Putin last month and then announced negotiations to end the war would begin quickly, blindsiding both Zelenskiy and his other Western allies.

Trump has also bristled at what he says is Europe’s long-standing failure to take on a greater share of its own security burden by collectively boosting defence spending.

European leaders now agree they must spend more on defence to show Trump the continent can protect itself. The EU will hold an emergency summit on Thursday.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she would inform member states on Tuesday about plans to strengthen the European defence industry and the EU’s military capabilities.

“We need a massive surge in defence, without any question. We want lasting peace, but lasting peace can only be built on strength, and strength begins with strengthening ourselves,” she said.

Russia has not concealed its delight, praising Trump for changing U.S. policy and denouncing Zelenskiy.

“We see that the collective West has partially begun to lose its collectivity, and a fragmentation of the collective West has begun,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

This news is sourced from Reuters and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »