France, Britain To Finalize Peace Plan With Ukraine ‘In Days,’ Set To Present To U.S.

France and Britain aim to finalize a Ukraine peace plan 'in days', seeking a truce and U.S. support for future security guarantees. [Image via Reuters/File]

France and Britain are aiming to finalise with Ukraine, possibly “in days”, a peace plan to present to the United States (U.S.), while building bridges between the U.S. and Ukraine before possible talks in Washington, diplomats said.

President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister Keir Starmer have held several calls, separately, with Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskiy since the presidents of the U.S. and Ukraine held a fractious meeting last Friday in the Oval Office that led to a suspension of U.S. military aid to Kyiv.

The breakdown in U.S.-Ukraine ties has given new urgency to the two European nuclear powers’ efforts to pull together ideas for a peace plan that would initially outline a short truce but also eventually include broader security guarantees.

Also See: France, UK Push for Ukraine Truce as Europe Seeks U.S. Support

Britain and France have both said the U.S. would be needed for future assurances.

“We’re looking at putting this plan together in days and not weeks,” said one senior European diplomat.

A second European diplomat said the idea was to have all the “ducks lined up”, including a more healthy dialogue between Washington and Kyiv, while underlining the message to the U.S. that Russia was the aggressor.

If the conditions were then in place, it could open the door to new meetings in Washington between the Europeans and Trump, although it was unclear at this stage whether this would also involve Zelenskiy or just the British and French leaders.

France’s government spokeswoman, Sophie Primas, told reporters on Wednesday that a visit by Macron, Starmer and Zelenskiy was under consideration, but the French presidency quickly corrected her to say that was not the case at this point.

The details of the plan have not been divulged and one European diplomat said military chiefs were aiming to finalise the military aspects over the next week.

One option is a partial one-month truce that would cover attacks by air and sea and also those targeting energy infrastructure but not ground fighting, and would be supported by France, Britain and a coalition of other willing countries, diplomats said.

Zelenskiy said on Tuesday he would be ready to come to the negotiating table and support the plans for a truce.

Primas told LCI television: “We have proposed a truce. That is what is being studied within the negotiations with the United States. France and Europe are trying to reestablish a link between the United States and Ukraine.”

This news is sourced from Reuters and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

As Bihar votes, Modi’s militarised politics faces its toughest test yet—will voters reject war rhetoric for real issues like jobs and poverty?

Bihar Should Reject Modi’s War Politics

Bihar’s election is shaping up as a test of Modi’s war-driven politics. With rising discontent over unemployment and poor governance, voters may choose to look past jingoism and focus on the real issues that shape their daily lives.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace represents a major shift from fraternal idealism to strategic realism in South Asia’s volatile security landscape. Rooted in classical realist thought, the doctrine emphasizes verification over trust, deterrence over sentiment, and conditional diplomacy over blind faith. Confronting the twin challenges of cross-border militancy and Indian-backed proxy networks in Afghanistan, Islamabad now seeks peace that is enforceable, monitored, and verifiable, anchoring regional stability on responsibility, not rhetoric.

Read More »
When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »