First US air strike on Taliban after the ceasefire ended

The US military says. That ended more than a week ago after an unusual ceasefire between the armed group and Afghan government forces. It has carried out its first airstrike against the Taliban.

No comment was made immediately after Friday\’s announcement. Col. Sonny Leggett, spokesman for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, said. An airstrike in the western province of Farah on Friday afternoon killed 25 Afghan fighters. Who attacked Afghan forces.

Hours earlier, the US air force struck an unknown number of Taliban in southern Kandahar province on Thursday night.
\”These were the first US airstrikes against (the Taliban) since the Eid ceasefire started,\” Leggett wrote. \”We reiterate: To allow the peace process to take hold, all sides must reduce violence,\” he added.

Leggett did not elaborate on the airstrikes or their motives. An Afghan government official, however, spoke on the condition of anonymity. Since he was not allowed to speak to the media, the Associated Press reported. Farah attacks killed three senior Taliban commanders and at least 13 other militants. News Agency.

On May 23, the Taliban announced a three-day surprise ceasefire with Afghan forces beginning the next day to coincide with Eid al-Fitr, the Muslim holiday that marks the end of Ramadan\’s fasting month.

The Kabul government welcomed the change and directed its troops to hold to the ceasefire.
There has since been an overall drop in violence across the world, with the Afghan government speeding up the release of hundreds of Taliban prisoners and saying it\’s ready to begin the long-delayed peace talks with the Taliban.
In February Washington signed a historic deal with the Taliban, promising to withdraw all US troops in exchange for security assurances.

Muhammed Saad

Muhammed Saad

Muhammed Saad, an author and independent researcher, focuses his inquiries on matters concerning regional affairs.

Recent

From The Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure

The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.

Read More »

The Indian Muslim: Living Between Faith and Fear

In September 2025, a simple expression of faith became a crime. When a devotional social media trend, the ‘I Love Muhammad’ campaign, went viral, it was deliberately framed as a provocation by authorities. The state’s response was swift and brutal: mass arrests and punitive demolitions that turned a peaceful act of devotion into a national flashpoint, revealing a clear intent to police and punish Muslim identity itself.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Long seen through a security lens, Pakistan is now redefining its role in US strategy, as a supplier of critical minerals, a connectivity hub between Central and South Asia, and a stabilizing force in a volatile region. Amid global competition with China and shifting energy dynamics, Washington increasingly views Pakistan’s stability not as a choice but as a strategic necessity anchoring its economic and geopolitical interests across Asia.

Read More »
The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates.

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates

Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.

Read More »