FIR Against Rahul Gandhi: Congress Slams BJP Tactics

Congress condemns FIR against Rahul Gandhi, calling it a BJP tactic, amid allegations of physical confrontation in Parliament. [Image via NDTV]

New Delhi: The Congress dismissed the FIR against Rahul Gandhi as a “badge of honour” and accused the BJP of using diversionary tactics. The FIR was registered yesterday following allegations that Mr Gandhi was responsible for injuring two BJP MPs – Pratap Sarangi and Mukesh Rajput – inside Parliament premises. The two MPs were subsequently hospitalised. 

“The FIR against Rahul Gandhi is nothing but a diversionary tactic in response to his staunch protest against the Home Minister. A case against him for defending Babasaheb’s legacy is a badge of honour. Rahul Ji is already facing 26 FIRs due to the BJP’s political vendetta. This latest FIR will not deter him or the Congress from standing up against the casteist RSS-BJP regime,” said Congress General Secretary KC Venugopal.

Mr Venugopal also questioned the inaction on complaints filed by Congress’ women MPs, who alleged physical assault by BJP leaders during the confrontation. “Why has the Delhi Police not acted on the FIRs filed by women MPs of INC against the BJP leaders?” he asked.

“The entire country is watching, they have slapped several cases on Rahul Gandhi. They bring in new FIRs and lie…This shows their desperation level,” said Priyanka Gandhi.

A police complaint was submitted by BJP MPs, led by Anurag Thakur, against Mr Gandhi. The complaint alleges that Mr Gandhi pushed BJP MPs during a protest on Parliament premises, causing injuries to Balasore MP Pratap Sarangi and Unnao MP Mukesh Rajput. 

Mr Thakur described the incident as a “very unfortunate” act of “arrogance” by Mr Gandhi, accusing him of considering himself above the law. He alleged that Mr Gandhi ignored a pathway designated by security personnel, leading to the physical confrontation. 

The Congress has categorically denied the allegations, accusing BJP MPs of obstructing Mr Gandhi’s peaceful protest. Party president Mallikarjun Kharge alleged that he was pushed violently during the incident, forcing him to sit down. “Now they are accusing us of shoving them,” the 82-year-old leader said.

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra claimed that BJP MPs carrying sticks blocked Mr Gandhi’s path. The Congress filed a counter-complaint against BJP MPs at the Parliament House police station, accusing them of instigating the chaos.

National Conference leader Omar Abdullah defended Mr Gandhi, stating, “I know Rahul Gandhi; he would not push anyone.”

Nagaland MP S Phangnon Konyak claimed that Mr Gandhi misbehaved with her during the altercation. In a letter to Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar, she alleged that Mr Gandhi’s physical proximity made her feel “extremely uncomfortable”. 

Also See: Whenever BJP and Congress Want, They Disrupt House, says Kalyan Banerjee

Rahul Gandhi Faces Notice

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has filed a breach of privilege notice against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of sharing a “criminally edited” version of Home Minister Amit Shah’s speech. Mr Dubey submitted the notice to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, alleging that Mr Gandhi’s actions are against parliamentary decorum.

The controversy erupted after Mr Gandhi shared a video of Mr Shah’s remarks in the Rajya Sabha, which were made during a discussion on the Constitution. Mr Dubey claims that the video was deliberately “edited” to misrepresent the Home Minister’s speech, specifically to portray him as disrespecting Dr Ambedkar.

In his letter to the Speaker, Mr Dubey described the Congress leader’s actions as an instance of “political bankruptcy.” 

This news is sourced from [NDTV] and is for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Herat tragedy claims 30 lives, exposing Afghanistan’s governance failures, unsafe migration, and escalating humanitarian crisis.

Herat Border Tragedy: The Deadly Consequences of Afghanistan’s Governance Failures

The Herat border tragedy, is a stark illustration of the human cost of Afghanistan’s governance failures. With limited economic opportunities, widespread poverty, and insufficient social support, families are forced to undertake life-threatening journeys across freezing mountains. The incident underscores the urgent need for the Afghan government to provide stable livelihoods, establish safe migration routes, and strengthen healthcare and social services, as humanitarian risks continue to escalate across the country.

Read More »
A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »