FIR Against Rahul Gandhi: Congress Slams BJP Tactics

Congress condemns FIR against Rahul Gandhi, calling it a BJP tactic, amid allegations of physical confrontation in Parliament. [Image via NDTV]

New Delhi: The Congress dismissed the FIR against Rahul Gandhi as a “badge of honour” and accused the BJP of using diversionary tactics. The FIR was registered yesterday following allegations that Mr Gandhi was responsible for injuring two BJP MPs – Pratap Sarangi and Mukesh Rajput – inside Parliament premises. The two MPs were subsequently hospitalised. 

“The FIR against Rahul Gandhi is nothing but a diversionary tactic in response to his staunch protest against the Home Minister. A case against him for defending Babasaheb’s legacy is a badge of honour. Rahul Ji is already facing 26 FIRs due to the BJP’s political vendetta. This latest FIR will not deter him or the Congress from standing up against the casteist RSS-BJP regime,” said Congress General Secretary KC Venugopal.

Mr Venugopal also questioned the inaction on complaints filed by Congress’ women MPs, who alleged physical assault by BJP leaders during the confrontation. “Why has the Delhi Police not acted on the FIRs filed by women MPs of INC against the BJP leaders?” he asked.

“The entire country is watching, they have slapped several cases on Rahul Gandhi. They bring in new FIRs and lie…This shows their desperation level,” said Priyanka Gandhi.

A police complaint was submitted by BJP MPs, led by Anurag Thakur, against Mr Gandhi. The complaint alleges that Mr Gandhi pushed BJP MPs during a protest on Parliament premises, causing injuries to Balasore MP Pratap Sarangi and Unnao MP Mukesh Rajput. 

Mr Thakur described the incident as a “very unfortunate” act of “arrogance” by Mr Gandhi, accusing him of considering himself above the law. He alleged that Mr Gandhi ignored a pathway designated by security personnel, leading to the physical confrontation. 

The Congress has categorically denied the allegations, accusing BJP MPs of obstructing Mr Gandhi’s peaceful protest. Party president Mallikarjun Kharge alleged that he was pushed violently during the incident, forcing him to sit down. “Now they are accusing us of shoving them,” the 82-year-old leader said.

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra claimed that BJP MPs carrying sticks blocked Mr Gandhi’s path. The Congress filed a counter-complaint against BJP MPs at the Parliament House police station, accusing them of instigating the chaos.

National Conference leader Omar Abdullah defended Mr Gandhi, stating, “I know Rahul Gandhi; he would not push anyone.”

Nagaland MP S Phangnon Konyak claimed that Mr Gandhi misbehaved with her during the altercation. In a letter to Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar, she alleged that Mr Gandhi’s physical proximity made her feel “extremely uncomfortable”. 

Also See: Whenever BJP and Congress Want, They Disrupt House, says Kalyan Banerjee

Rahul Gandhi Faces Notice

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has filed a breach of privilege notice against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of sharing a “criminally edited” version of Home Minister Amit Shah’s speech. Mr Dubey submitted the notice to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, alleging that Mr Gandhi’s actions are against parliamentary decorum.

The controversy erupted after Mr Gandhi shared a video of Mr Shah’s remarks in the Rajya Sabha, which were made during a discussion on the Constitution. Mr Dubey claims that the video was deliberately “edited” to misrepresent the Home Minister’s speech, specifically to portray him as disrespecting Dr Ambedkar.

In his letter to the Speaker, Mr Dubey described the Congress leader’s actions as an instance of “political bankruptcy.” 

This news is sourced from [NDTV] and is for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Narrative by Design: Al Jazeera’s Editorial Tilt on the Pakistan–TTP Conflict

Narrative by Design: Al Jazeera’s Editorial Tilt on the Pakistan–TTP Conflict

Al Jazeera’s reputation for alternative journalism contrasts sharply with its recent reporting on Pakistan’s conflict with the TTP and tensions with the Afghan Taliban. A close review shows consistent editorial choices that soften the Taliban’s image, reframe terrorist violence as resistance, and cast Pakistan’s counter-terrorism actions as aggression—ultimately reshaping the narrative in Kabul’s favour.

Read More »
Modern Platforms, Evolving Doctrine

Modern Platforms, Evolving Doctrine

The Gulf’s air-power evolution is increasingly shaped by the fusion of advanced platforms with modern doctrine and faster decision cycles. As regional forces adapt to complex threat environments, partners like Pakistan, whose operational experience spans multiple domains, are becoming part of the broader conversation on future air-power thinking.

Read More »
Economic Engagement or Ethical Dilemma? Canada-India Relations and the Nijjar Case

Economic Engagement or Ethical Dilemma? Canada-India Relations and the Nijjar Case

Canada’s renewed trade outreach to India comes at a moment of deep diplomatic strain. As Minister Maninder Sidhu seeks to revive economic cooperation, the unresolved assassination of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, and allegations implicating senior Indian officials, cast a long shadow. The controversy raises critical questions about whether Ottawa can balance economic ambitions with justice, accountability, and the protection of Canadian sovereignty.

Read More »
Zohran Mamdani calls out Modi and Netanyahu as war criminals, linking Gujarat 2002 and Gaza, and demands global justice and accountability.

Zohran Mamdani Stands Up for Justice: Holding Modi and Netanyahu Accountable

Zohran Mamdani, a rising progressive voice in the U.S., has boldly equated Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with war crimes. Drawing on global principles like the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and ICC indictments, Mamdani challenges the immunity of influential leaders and advocates for accountability for mass atrocities in Gujarat (2002) and Gaza.

Read More »