FBI Confirms Zahran Hashim as Mastermind of Sri Lanka’s Easter Sunday Attacks

FBI confirms Zahran Hashim as mastermind of 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings in affidavit detailing ISIS links. [Image via The Daily Mirror]

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the United States, which conducted investigations into serial bombings on Easter Sunday in 2019, has clearly mentioned Zahran Hashim as the mastermind of the attack.

“Before detonating the IED (Improvised Explosive Device) that killed himself and scores of victims, Jahran Mohamed Cassim also known as (aka) Mohamed Cassim Mohamed Zahran aka Zahran Hashim was the mastermind behind the Easter Sunday attacks and the self-proclaimed leader of ISIS in Sri Lanka, FBI Special Agent Merrilee R.Goodwin said in an affidavit related to the criminal case filed on December 11, 2020, in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.

It is the result of a nearly two-year investigation by the FBI, which assisted Sri Lankan authorities in the wake of the suicide bombings that targeted Christian churches and luxury hotels frequented by Westerners. In the attack, 268 persons were killed, and over 500 injured. Among the killed were five US citizens.

Three Sri Lankan citizens have been charged with terrorism offences, including conspiring to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organisation (ISIS). The men were part of a group of ISIS supporters which called itself “ISIS in Sri Lanka”.

The issue is once again in the news because former MP Udaya Gammanpila shared a copy of the affidavit with the local press by posting it on his website.

According to the report, Zahran had communicated with the ISIS leadership in Syria and obtained approval to operate as an ISIS affiliate.

Also See: Taliban’s Shifting Storylines: Is ISIS-K Really a ‘Foreign’ Problem

Following the attack, the then Sri Lankan government asked for assistance from the United States.

Within hours FBI deployed personnel to Sri Lanka to assist Sri Lankan authorities and to conduct investigations. The FBI collected and processed evidence, identified attackers and their associates, coordinated medical treatment of injured Americans and the return of five deceased U.S. citizens.

FBI Special Agent Merrilee R.Goodwin, in an affidavit to the District Court of California in the United, informed it.

He informed court that he had wide experience in the conduct of investigations into designated foreign terrorist organisations, including ISIS.

“From my work on these investigations, I have learnt the organisational and operational strategies employed by terrorists, the vernacular they use, including Arabic terms, and the Islamist ideology. I have deployed overseas several times to investigate terrorist attacks and crimes against United States nationals. In that role, I have processed crime scenes, collected evidence, and conducted interviews,” he said in the affidavit.

This news is sourced from Daily Mirror and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »