Even Amid Flaring Tensions With The US, Russia Delivers Second S-400 Systems To China

The second S-400 missile defense system was shipped to China by Russia in the face of increasing tensions with the US. The S-400s were allegedly shipped by maritime routes. Additionally, the handing over certificate was signed in China in December, a military-diplomatic source told the Russian news agency.

S-400 contract with China

Similarly, China became the first international buyer of Russia’s most advanced S-400 surface-to-air missile systems. Russia signed a contract with China on the delivery of two regimental sets of S-400s in 2014.

Furthermore, the first S-400 Regimental Collection was shipped to China in 2018. The Chinese army effectively evaluated the rocket launchers and reached an aerodynamic target and a ballistic one.

S-400 Triumph is designed to kill ships, cruise, and ballistic missiles, which can be used against land installations as well. The will hit objectives up to 400 km away and at an altitude of up to 30 KM.

Contradicting Reports in Indian Media

Moreover, Russia reportedly halted the supply of S-400 air defense systems to China according to sources in India. Citing news site Sohu, UAWire wrote, This time, \”Russia confirmed that it will delay missile delivery for the Chinese S-400 weapon. At some point, we can claim that it is for China\’s sake. However, purchasing a firearm isn\’t as straightforward as signing an invoice in China.\”

\”They claim the job is very complicated in supplying those guns. Although China wants to send out training instructors, Russia still needs to send a ton of professional workers to bring the arms into operation, \”Sohu said.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »