Elon Musk and Zalmay Khalilzad Advocate for Closure of U.S.-Funded Media Outlets

Elon Musk, Zalmay Khalilzad call for shutting down VOA, RFE/RL, sparking debate on U.S. government-funded media. [Image via Pajhwok]

February 12, 2025 – Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and former U.S. diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad have jointly called for the shutdown of two prominent U.S.-funded media organizations: Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). Their criticism has ignited discussions about the role and funding of government-supported media in the United States.

Musk’s Critique

Musk labeled VOA and RFE/RL as “relics of the past,” questioning the necessity of government-funded media in the current era. He further stated, “It’s just radical left crazy people talking to themselves while torching $1B/year of US taxpayer money.”

Khalilzad’s Perspective

Khalilzad echoed Musk’s concerns, emphasizing that the content produced by these media outlets sometimes appears to be driven by activist narratives rather than journalistic integrity. He suggested that the U.S. should reassess whether such media services genuinely support American interests or if they are being misused to promote alternative agendas.

Background on VOA and RFE/RL

Voice of America, established in 1942, provides news and information in over 40 languages, reaching an estimated weekly audience of more than 326 million people worldwide. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, founded in 1949 and 1951 respectively, broadcasts in 27 languages to 23 countries, with a weekly audience exceeding 47 million. Both organizations operate under the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), a government agency responsible for overseeing all U.S. international broadcasting.

Also See: Banned Terrorists, Unbanned Voices? X Hosts BLA Propaganda Space

Implications of Potential Closure

The proposed closure of VOA and RFE/RL raises questions about the future of U.S. international broadcasting and its role in promoting democracy and free press globally. Supporters of these organizations argue that they serve as vital sources of independent news in regions with restricted press freedom. For instance, in Afghanistan, where media freedom has declined under the current regime, these platforms provide a critical voice for those without access to independent reporting.

The debate over government-funded media is not confined to the United States. In Pakistan, VOA has faced criticism for its reporting, with allegations of bias and interference in internal affairs. Such criticisms highlight the challenges faced by international broadcasters in maintaining credibility and neutrality.

Elon Musk and Zalmay Khalilzad’s call for the closure of VOA and RFE/RL has sparked a broader conversation about the role of government-funded media in the modern information landscape. As discussions continue, the future of these organizations remains uncertain, with potential implications for global media freedom and the dissemination of information.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »