Elon Musk and Zalmay Khalilzad Advocate for Closure of U.S.-Funded Media Outlets

Elon Musk, Zalmay Khalilzad call for shutting down VOA, RFE/RL, sparking debate on U.S. government-funded media. [Image via Pajhwok]

February 12, 2025 – Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and former U.S. diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad have jointly called for the shutdown of two prominent U.S.-funded media organizations: Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). Their criticism has ignited discussions about the role and funding of government-supported media in the United States.

Musk’s Critique

Musk labeled VOA and RFE/RL as “relics of the past,” questioning the necessity of government-funded media in the current era. He further stated, “It’s just radical left crazy people talking to themselves while torching $1B/year of US taxpayer money.”

Khalilzad’s Perspective

Khalilzad echoed Musk’s concerns, emphasizing that the content produced by these media outlets sometimes appears to be driven by activist narratives rather than journalistic integrity. He suggested that the U.S. should reassess whether such media services genuinely support American interests or if they are being misused to promote alternative agendas.

Background on VOA and RFE/RL

Voice of America, established in 1942, provides news and information in over 40 languages, reaching an estimated weekly audience of more than 326 million people worldwide. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, founded in 1949 and 1951 respectively, broadcasts in 27 languages to 23 countries, with a weekly audience exceeding 47 million. Both organizations operate under the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), a government agency responsible for overseeing all U.S. international broadcasting.

Also See: Banned Terrorists, Unbanned Voices? X Hosts BLA Propaganda Space

Implications of Potential Closure

The proposed closure of VOA and RFE/RL raises questions about the future of U.S. international broadcasting and its role in promoting democracy and free press globally. Supporters of these organizations argue that they serve as vital sources of independent news in regions with restricted press freedom. For instance, in Afghanistan, where media freedom has declined under the current regime, these platforms provide a critical voice for those without access to independent reporting.

The debate over government-funded media is not confined to the United States. In Pakistan, VOA has faced criticism for its reporting, with allegations of bias and interference in internal affairs. Such criticisms highlight the challenges faced by international broadcasters in maintaining credibility and neutrality.

Elon Musk and Zalmay Khalilzad’s call for the closure of VOA and RFE/RL has sparked a broader conversation about the role of government-funded media in the modern information landscape. As discussions continue, the future of these organizations remains uncertain, with potential implications for global media freedom and the dissemination of information.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »