Elections In IIOJK Cannot Resolve Kashmir Dispute: Mirwaiz

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq criticizes IIOJK elections, asserting they won't resolve Kashmir's conflict amid political suppression.

As the final phase of local elections nears in Indian-Illegally Occupied Kashmir (IIOJK), resistance leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq has expressed concerns. He believes the elections will not resolve the long-standing conflict. This conflict lies at the heart of Kashmir’s dispute between India and Pakistan.

Mirwaiz, who has spent much of the last five years under house arrest, criticized the polls. He stated that the elections are taking place while authorities silence voices opposing India’s control over the region. He pointed out that the elections do not address the larger conflict. This conflict arose after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government revoked Kashmir’s semi-autonomy in 2019. In an interview with The Associated Press, he dismissed the elections. The Indian government has labeled them a “festival of democracy,” but he considers them a distraction.

“These elections cannot be the means to address the larger Kashmir issue,” said Mirwaiz. He also serves as a Muslim cleric and custodian of Srinagar’s historic grand mosque. This mosque is a focal point for anti-India sentiment.

The multi-stage elections will create a local government and a regional legislature with limited powers. The final phase is set for Tuesday, October 1, 2024. This marks the first such elections in a decade. It is also the first vote since 2019, when the Indian government stripped Jammu and Kashmir of its statehood. The region was reduced to a union territory governed directly by New Delhi.

The Kashmir Conflict and the Elections

The local elections in Indian-Illegally Occupied Kashmir (IIOJK) unfold in an environment of deep frustration and political suppression. This situation follows India’s 2019 revocation of the region’s semi-autonomous status, a move widely regarded by Kashmiris as an illegal annexation. While India touts the elections as a democratic exercise, many Kashmiris view them as superficial. They find the elections particularly lacking in the absence of true political dialogue or representation for those who seek self-determination.

Pakistan has historically supported the Kashmiris’ right to self-determination, in line with the United Nations resolutions, while India’s actions have often been viewed as an attempt to solidify control over the region by curtailing political freedoms and altering its demographic and political landscape. These elections, therefore, do little to address the plight of Kashmiris, who continue to face human rights abuses, political disenfranchisement, and heavy military presence. For many, the elections are a reminder that genuine peace and resolution will not come through a truncated local government but through addressing the fundamental aspirations of the Kashmiri people for freedom and justice.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »