Development or Demographic Shift? Kashmir’s Farmers Resist Land Takeover

Kashmir's farmers resist land takeover as highways and townships reshape the region under India's development drive. [Image via AFP]

Musadiq Hussain said that police “destroyed” his rice crop when a large chunk of his smallholding was expropriated to make way for a four-lane, 60-kilometre (40-mile) highway around the key city of Srinagar.

“It has affected my sense of who I am and my self-respect,” said 41-year-old Hussain, adding he can no longer grow enough rice and vegetables to feed his family.

“I feel like my mind is shrinking, just like my land.”

Hussain’s land was taken in 2018 but the process has intensified in recent years.

The road, along with other highways and railways, is also swallowing swathes of orchards prized for their almonds, apples and other fruit in the Himalayan region, split between India and Pakistan since 1947.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu-nationalist government, which imposed direct rule in 2019, says that the multi-billion-dollar drive is bringing a “new era of peace” and “unprecedented development”.

New Delhi says it will boost trade and tourism, while also bolstering military access across the restive territory and to strategic border zones with Pakistan and China.

‘Settler colonial land grab’

Authorities say construction within 500 metres (yards) on either side of the highway around Srinagar is banned.

Kashmiri political parties accuse the Indian government of wanting to change Kashmir's demographic makeup to create a Hindu majority -- something the authorities do not comment on
Kashmiri political parties accuse the Indian government of wanting to change Kashmir’s demographic makeup to create a Hindu majority — something the authorities do not comment on © Tauseef MUSTAFA / AFP

But last year, authorities unveiled plans to build more than 20 “satellite townships” along the route, with drawings showing highrise developments it called a “Pearl in the Paradise”.

Kashmiri political parties are demanding to know who the housing is for, accusing Modi’s government of wanting to change Kashmir’s demographic makeup to create a Hindu majority — something the authorities do not comment on.

Goldie Osuri, who studies Indian policies in Kashmir at Britain’s University of Warwick, uses a phrase often associated with Israel’s occupation of the West Bank to describe the situation: a “settler colonial land grab”.

“Kashmiri farmers… are being dispossessed of their land and livelihoods in the name of Indian development as ‘a gift’ for Kashmir,” Osuri told AFP.

She called the project a bid to “‘Hinduise’ Kashmir at the expense of Kashmiri Muslims”.

After New Delhi ended Kashmir’s constitutionally enshrined partial autonomy in 2019, land laws also changed.

That allowed all Indians to buy land in Kashmir for the first time.

Thousands of acres of “state lands” were added to registers to attract outside businesses.

After New Delhi ended Kashmir's constitutionally enshrined partial autonomy in 2019, land laws also changed
After New Delhi ended Kashmir’s constitutionally enshrined partial autonomy in 2019, land laws also changed © Tauseef MUSTAFA / AFP

“This is a land grab in plain sight,” said Waheed Ur Rehman Para, a member of Kashmir’s local assembly.

Many say that has undermined previous land reforms that granted ownership or farming rights to hundreds of thousands of people.

It worries Kashmiri leaders.

“We want this land to remain ours”, Modi critic Omar Abdullah, Kashmir’s chief minister, told a rally last month. “Without it, what do we truly possess?”

But Siddiq Wahid, a historian at India’s Shiv Nadar University, said that the region’s political parties showed “no intent to unite, only to pull each other down”.

“In this lazy politics lies the chief worry for us all”, he said.

Also See: Kashmiris Fear Losing Orchards And Land To Modi’s Mega Projects

‘Where will we go?’

More than half a million Indian soldiers are in Indian-administered Kashmir, battling rebels who want independence or to be part of Pakistan.

Tens of thousands of people have been killed in the conflict since 1989 in the territory of some 12 million people.

Police have also seized land and properties — including orchards, commercial buildings and homes — of people with alleged links to rebel groups.

Exact figures for the total area requisitioned are not public. Landowners say that the compensation offered is sometimes too low, and some are suing the government.

Musadiq Hussain said that police 'destroyed' his rice crop when a large chunk of his smallholding was expropriated to make way for a highway
Musadiq Hussain said that police ‘destroyed’ his rice crop when a large chunk of his smallholding was expropriated to make way for a highway © Tauseef MUSTAFA / AFP

In December, government authorities ordered the transfer of more than 600 acres (240 hectares) of orchards for a new university campus for the National Institute of Technology.

It sparked furious protests from the hundreds of families who depend on the almond and apple trees.

Elsewhere, in the village of Dirhama, farmers are angry at their land being requisitioned for a new train station, serving a 40-kilometre railway to an important Hindu shrine.

Standing in a field as snow fell, apple farmer Mohammad Ramzan said there was no room for a railway line.

“Where is the space? We all have our small patches of land. Where will we go?” asked the 78-year-old.

The plan has struck a nerve in Kashmir, where land and identity are deeply intertwined.

“This self-sustenance has ensured Kashmiri survival despite decades of curfews, strikes and uprisings,” said Osuri.

Mohammad Shafi, a 61-year-old farmer, asked: “What is this development for when my family will be landless?”

This news is sourced from France 24 and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »