China’s Xi Backs Putin, Strengthens ‘No Limits’ Partnership on Ukraine Conflict Anniversary

Xi Jinping reaffirms China's "no limits" partnership with Putin, underscoring strong ties amid U.S. diplomatic shifts on Ukraine. [Image via Reuters]

BEIJING, Feb 24 – China’s President Xi Jinping affirmed his “no limits” partnership in a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, China’s state media reported, on the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The leaders held the talks as U.S. President Donald Trump has pushed for a quick deal to end the Ukraine war, raising the prospect that Washington could draw a wedge between Xi and Putin to focus on competing with the world’s second largest economy.

The call appeared aimed at dispelling any such prospects – the two leaders underscored the durability and the “long-term” nature of their alliance, with its own internal dynamics that would not be impacted by any “third party”.

“China-Russia relations have strong internal driving force and unique strategic value, and are not aimed at, nor are they influenced by, any third party,” said Xi, according to the official readout published by Chinese state media.

“The development strategies and foreign policies of China and Russia are long-term,” said Xi, adding that the two countries “are good neighbours that cannot be moved apart”.

Russia, waging war against NATO-supplied Ukrainian forces, and China, under pressure from a concerted U.S. effort to counter its growing military and economic strength, increasingly have found common geopolitical cause.

Xi has told Putin in recent years that the two have the chance to drive “changes the world has not seen in a century”, which many analysts see as an attempt to challenge a U.S.-led global order.

China and Russia declared a “no limits” strategic partnership days before Putin sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine in February 2022. Xi has met Putin over 40 times in the past decade and Putin in recent months described China as an ally.

“The Russians will see what carrots Trump may dangle to create distance between Moscow and Beijing, but they are confident that they can keep both pragmatic, beneficial ties with China and engage the United States if Trump is really willing to play ball,” said Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

Also See: Zelensky in Ankara for Talks with Erdogan Amid U.S.-Russia Diplomacy Shift

‘ROBUST PARTNERSHIP’

Trump has alarmed Washington’s European allies by leaving them and Ukraine out of talks with Russia held last week in Saudi Arabia and blaming Ukraine for Russia’s 2022 invasion.

Putin also informed Xi “about the recent Russian-American contacts”, according to a Kremlin statement.

Xi said that China was “pleased to see the positive efforts made by Russia and all parties concerned to defuse the crisis,” noting China’s initiatives such as the creation of a group of nations called “friends of peace”.

These efforts have focused on portraying China as a neutral peacemaker, but critics say they lack substance because the West accuses China of supporting Russia’s war effort through supplies of dual use goods and massive purchases of Russian oil and gas.

China has denied it supports Russia’s military-industrial base. China’s top diplomat, Wang Yi, said at the Munich Security Conference last week China would not stop buying Russia’s gas because doing so would make China unsafe.

Instead, Xi has directed bureaucrats to study Trump’s policies and to respond to his initial tariffs and threats, as China’s struggling economy with high youth unemployment is poorly placed to weather another trade war with Washington.

This was the second call both leaders have held this year, after they discussed how to build ties with Trump in January.

Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center’s Gabuev said that the “fact that both sides did it on the third anniversary of the war just tells you how robust this partnership has become.”

The two sides also discussed preparations for the commemoration of the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany in World War Two. Earlier this month, Xi accepted Russia’s invitation to attend the event in May.

This news is sourced from Reuters and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

As Bihar votes, Modi’s militarised politics faces its toughest test yet—will voters reject war rhetoric for real issues like jobs and poverty?

Bihar Should Reject Modi’s War Politics

Bihar’s election is shaping up as a test of Modi’s war-driven politics. With rising discontent over unemployment and poor governance, voters may choose to look past jingoism and focus on the real issues that shape their daily lives.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace represents a major shift from fraternal idealism to strategic realism in South Asia’s volatile security landscape. Rooted in classical realist thought, the doctrine emphasizes verification over trust, deterrence over sentiment, and conditional diplomacy over blind faith. Confronting the twin challenges of cross-border militancy and Indian-backed proxy networks in Afghanistan, Islamabad now seeks peace that is enforceable, monitored, and verifiable, anchoring regional stability on responsibility, not rhetoric.

Read More »
When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »