Chandrakar’s Murder Exposes Risks for Journalists in India

Mukesh Chandrakar's murder reveals the dangers faced by journalists in India, highlighting corruption, impunity, and press freedom. [Image via @MukeshChandrak9]

Mukesh Chandrakar, a 32-year-old freelance journalist from the Indian state of Chhattisgarh, has tragically been found dead in a septic tank in the town of Bijapur. Known for his investigative reports on corruption in the construction industry, including a recent expose on a road construction scam, Chandrakar’s gruesome murder sheds light on the dangers faced by journalists in India, particularly those exposing corruption.

Chandrakar’s Disappearance and Discovery

Chandrakar had been reported missing by his family on New Year’s Day. His body was discovered on Friday, hidden in a septic tank at a construction contractor’s compound in Bijapur. The police confirmed that his body had been concealed under newly placed concrete slabs. Initial investigations revealed that Chandrakar’s body bore signs of blunt force trauma, indicating that his death was a result of foul play.

Local authorities suspect that his murder is directly linked to his recent investigation into alleged corruption in a road construction project in Bijapur. Following the report, the police had initiated an investigation into the matter.

Arrests Made, One Suspect Still at Large

Three people have been arrested in connection with Chandrakar’s death. One of the key suspects, Suresh Chandrakar, the owner of the construction site where the body was found, remains on the run. Authorities are continuing their efforts to apprehend him.

Press Groups Express Outrage and Demand Action

The discovery of Chandrakar’s body has sparked outrage among Indian press watchdogs and local journalists. A protest was held in Chhattisgarh by members of the Bastar Journalist Association, with its president, Manish Gupta, calling the incident a “dark chapter” for the state. He urged both the police and the government to provide better safety measures for journalists working in such dangerous environments.

The Press Council of India issued a statement expressing grave concern over the suspected murder and called for a thorough investigation into the facts surrounding Chandrakar’s death.

Chhattisgarh’s Chief Minister Responds to the Murder

Vishnu Deo Sai, the Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), described the incident as “heartbreaking.” He promised to ensure that the individuals responsible for Chandrakar’s murder would face the “harshest punishment.”

India: One of the Most Dangerous Places for Journalists

India has become one of the most perilous countries for journalists, with 28 journalists killed over the past decade, according to global media watchdog Reporters Without Borders. The recent murder of Mukesh Chandrakar adds to this grim toll, underscoring the rising dangers that journalists face, particularly those reporting on corruption and human rights abuses.

The Growing Danger for Journalists Exposing Corruption and Human Rights Violations

Chandrakar’s murder is a part of a broader trend where journalists who expose corruption and the nexus between the state and business interests face deadly consequences. Freelance and independent journalists, like Chandrakar, are especially vulnerable, as they lack the support of large media organizations and often become easy targets for those looking to silence critical voices.

India’s media landscape has grown increasingly hostile toward those who challenge the establishment. Journalists reporting on corruption or human rights violations are often subjected to harassment, threats, and violence. In rural areas like Chhattisgarh, where corruption runs deep, journalists investigating powerful local contractors and politicians are often attacked to prevent them from revealing the truth.

A Culture of Impunity and Delayed Investigations

Instead of offering protection to journalists, law enforcement agencies (LEAs) in India often act as instruments of state suppression, targeting those who threaten the dominant narrative. Investigations into the killings of journalists are often delayed or undermined, fostering a culture of impunity that allows perpetrators to act with little fear of repercussions.

Press Freedom Under Threat: India’s Declining Global Ranking

Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India’s press freedom ranking has plummeted. Reporters Without Borders consistently ranks India as one of the most dangerous countries for journalists. In its 2024 report, Amnesty International highlighted the escalation of attacks on media freedom, documenting over 50 cases of harassment, imprisonment, and violence against journalists.

Digital Platforms Becoming Battlegrounds for Independent Journalists

In recent years, digital platforms like YouTube, once considered a safe space for independent journalism, have become battlegrounds where investigative reporters face not only digital but also physical threats. Journalists challenging the mainstream narrative are increasingly subjected to coordinated attacks, both online and offline.

The Modi Government’s Role in the Suppression of Media Freedom

The Modi government has fostered a polarized media environment, where critical journalists are often branded as “anti-national” or “urban Naxals.” This rhetoric fuels attacks on media personnel and creates a chilling effect that discourages investigative reporting. The recent murder of Mukesh Chandrakar highlights the high stakes for journalists in India, who risk their lives to uncover the truth.

Also See: Covert Indian Assassination Programme in Pakistan: Report

A Call for Justice and Safety for Journalists

The brutal murder of Mukesh Chandrakar underscores the grave dangers that journalists in India face when they report on corruption, human rights violations, and state abuses. Media rights groups and local press associations are demanding swift justice, better protections, and an end to the culture of impunity that allows attacks on journalists to go unpunished.

Chandrakar’s death should serve as a wake-up call for the Indian government to address the growing threats against journalists and to take meaningful steps to protect those who risk everything to report the truth.

This news is sourced from The Guardian and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »