Challenges of Afghan Withdrawal: Talks between US and Taliban

xplore Biden's challenges with Afghan withdrawal and its impact on regional peace amid ongoing negotiations and turmoil.

Currently, the process of US forces withdrawal and the Afghan Peace settlement is one of the biggest headaches. This applies not only to the US but also to the regional stakeholders.  Last year, the US and the Taliban signed a peace agreement in Doha. The deal called for political settlement and peace in Afghanistan in return for US withdrawal by May 1st of 2021.

Apparently, that could not happen. Biden was unfortunate enough to receive all the predicaments caused by President Trump. Mr Trump at the time knew that calling a withdrawal is very hasty. It was evident that it will be a hefty task for the next administration. That is exactly what happened.

Afghan Withdrawal, A Challenge for Biden

When Biden took hold of the office in early 2021, his country was already in turmoil. America was facing a million internal issues. However, the biggest challenge was the Afghan withdrawal. Seeing all the figures and situation, Biden initially announced that the withdrawal will not be possible. There is an expected delay in the withdrawal. This announcement called in for a harsh reaction from the Taliban.

Biden announced last month that US forces will be withdrawing by September 11 of this year. A very symbolic day to withdraw on, something we expect the Taliban to later cash upon. However, as reported, Kabul stated that the US and the Taliban might agree on hasty and early withdrawal by July.

Keeping this in mind, we can say that this will be a key event that would determine the peace in the region because the Kabul government is already brainstorming on how to contain the Taliban on its own once these foreign forces are gone.

For that, US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad visited Kabul on Monday to discuss the developments on withdrawal, which started on recent Saturday, May 1st. Zalmay also met with Marshal Dostum in Tashkent before coming to Kabul. In Tashkent, Zalmay also had the opportunity to meet Uzbek Foreign Minister Abdulaziz Kamilov, with whom Zalmay discussed the Afghan Peace Process.

Meeting at Dostum

The Afghan peace process was the main crux of the discussion with Dostum. Dostum, like his rank, is a very influential figure in Afghan, either it is in terms of politics or security. Once a warlord fighting against the Taliban, he is now a government official and was given a five-star rank in 2020.

Zalmay also met with Afghan negotiation officials in Qatar last week to discuss the developments in the negotiation process. Qatar has been a vital bridge between the Taliban and the Afghan government.

However, despite everything, the Taliban have also been unpredictable as they have already refused to participate in the Istanbul Conference that has been postponed twice. Now it is to see if the July withdrawal takes place or not? If it does, what impact will it have on regional peace?

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »