Canada, Australia to Develop Arctic Radar System

Canada and Australia to develop a $6B Arctic radar system as Carney warns of rising threats from adversaries in the region. [Image via Reuters]

Canada and Australia are planning to jointly develop a new military radar system in the Arctic amid a global surge of interest in the region, according to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who warned that Canada’s “adversaries are increasingly emboldened.”

“Our government will be working with our longstanding defense and security partners, Australia, to build a new long range over-the-horizon military radar system,” Carney told reporters in Iqaluit, Nunavut at a press conference on Tuesday.

“This is an investment of more than $6 billion in the most advanced and efficient radar system,” Carney continued, adding that the new installation “will enable Canada to detect and respond to both air and maritime threats over our Arctic faster and from further away.”

“It will most fundamentally keep all Canadians safe,” Carney said.

Any kind of new Canadian defense infrastructure in the Arctic would likely have to be compatible with NORAD, a key US-Canadian defense agreement.

“Canada must be strong in our partnerships, particularly NORAD,” Carney said. “Today’s announcements will strengthen our commitment to NORAD. We cannot and should not look first to others to defend our nation.”

Carney also announced that his government would establish a “greater sustained and year-round presence here in the Arctic,” investing a further $420 million (Canadian) “to protect our aerial maritime and terrestrial sovereignty.”

“Our adversaries are increasingly emboldened,” Carney added. “International institutions and norms that have kept Canada secure are now being called into question. And the United States priorities’, once closely aligned with our own, are beginning to shift.”

Also See: Prime Minister Carney To Bolster Canada’s Relations With France, UK, And Assert Sovereignty

Only eight countries have territory within the strategically and environmentally sensitive Arctic region – Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the United States – and competition for clout is intensifying.

Canada, currently in the midst of its worst diplomatic spat with the United States in years, collaborates on security with its southern neighbor but has also long disagreed over the extent of Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic. Canada insists that the Northwest Passage through Arctic waters, for instance, lies exclusively within Canadian territory, while the US, asserts that the sea lane is in international waters.

Meanwhile, China and Russia have been coordinating activity in the Arctic. In July, the US Department of Defense warned that “growing cooperation” between Russia and China in the region has the “potential to alter the Arctic’s stability and threat picture.”

US and Canadian forces intercepted Russian and Chinese bombers flying together near Alaska that same month, while the nations’ two navies have operated together in international waters off the Alaskan coast in 2022 and 2023, according to the US military.

And as US President Donald Trump doubles down on his interest in controlling Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory in the region, Denmark has also been investing more in regional security, saying in January that it would spend 14.6 billion Danish kroner ($2.05 billion) to boost its own military capabilities in the Arctic.

This news is sourced from CNN and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »