BGB Reclaims Kodalia River, Challenges India’s Claim

BGB reclaims a 5km stretch of Kodalia River from BSF, amid ongoing territorial disputes between India and Bangladesh. [Image via Bangladesh Daily Prothom Alo]

The Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) has claimed to have regained control over around 5km stretch of the Kodalia River along the Jhenaidah border, ending the illegal dominance of the Border Security Force (BSF) of India.

According to the BGB, the Bangladeshi nationals had long been denied entry to the river’s particular stretch in Maheshpur upazila of Jhenaidah as it was occupied by the BSF. Even the fishermen were barred by the BSF men from netting fish in the river. 

In a press release on Monday, the 58 BGB battalion assured that any Bangladeshi nationals can now freely use the 5km stretch of the Kodalia river. However, Indian news outlets reported that the BSF denied the BGB claim, terming it baseless. 

Entering Bangladesh from India through the Shyamkur zero line in Maheshpur, the Kodalia river meanders through Bangladeshi territory and reenters India through the Ranghat point. In Maheshpur, the river flows along the border in Matila village of Jadavpur union. 

Under international laws, both countries must maintain a 150-yard no-man’s land from the zero line. As per the map adopted in 1961, the 4.8-km stretch of the river falls on the Bangladesh side of the zero line. The adjacent locality is sparsely populated and the BSF took the advantage to establish its control over the river.

It was learned that the BSF used to restrict Bangladeshi nationals from using the river. Mohiuddin, a former member of Jadavpur union parishad, recounted that there was a time when the locals used to net fish in the river. When the people moved away from the bordering neighbourhood due to their inconvenience, the BSF established their control over the river, though it falls within the Bangladeshi territory. 

“Farmers were prevented from farming in adjacent land and netting fish in the river. Whenever locals tried to use the river, the BSF would intervene, leading to altercations sometimes,” he noted. 

Upon learning about the issue, the 58-BGB battalion verified the border through official documents, local administration, and maps, and lodged a strong protest against the BSF’s illegal dominance. They eventually managed to reclaim control over the 4.8-kilometer stretch and deployed additional forces along the border, along with mechanised boats and all-terrain vehicles.

On Monday, Lt Col Shah Md Azizus Shahid, commanding officer of the 58-BGB battalion, exchanged views with locals and informed them that they can now freely use the river. He thanked the locals for their cooperation with the BGB and urged them to keep the young generation well-informed about the position of the border. 

Also See: Bangladesh’s Evolving Foreign Relations in South Asia

Protest from the BSF

Indian media outlets, including PTI and Anandabazar Patrika, disputed the BGB claim and cited the BSF to term the move as ‘irresponsible’. The reports noted that the 5-km area is considered as Indian territory under the border agreement of 1975, and that there have been longstanding disputes over its control. 

In response, the BGB commanding officer said, “The Indian media reports came to our attention. They are spreading lies. We have not received any written or verbal objections from either BSF battalion commander or company commander regarding my press briefing.” 

This news is sourced from Bangladesh Daily Prothom Alo and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »