BGB Reclaims Kodalia River, Challenges India’s Claim

BGB reclaims a 5km stretch of Kodalia River from BSF, amid ongoing territorial disputes between India and Bangladesh. [Image via Bangladesh Daily Prothom Alo]

The Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) has claimed to have regained control over around 5km stretch of the Kodalia River along the Jhenaidah border, ending the illegal dominance of the Border Security Force (BSF) of India.

According to the BGB, the Bangladeshi nationals had long been denied entry to the river’s particular stretch in Maheshpur upazila of Jhenaidah as it was occupied by the BSF. Even the fishermen were barred by the BSF men from netting fish in the river. 

In a press release on Monday, the 58 BGB battalion assured that any Bangladeshi nationals can now freely use the 5km stretch of the Kodalia river. However, Indian news outlets reported that the BSF denied the BGB claim, terming it baseless. 

Entering Bangladesh from India through the Shyamkur zero line in Maheshpur, the Kodalia river meanders through Bangladeshi territory and reenters India through the Ranghat point. In Maheshpur, the river flows along the border in Matila village of Jadavpur union. 

Under international laws, both countries must maintain a 150-yard no-man’s land from the zero line. As per the map adopted in 1961, the 4.8-km stretch of the river falls on the Bangladesh side of the zero line. The adjacent locality is sparsely populated and the BSF took the advantage to establish its control over the river.

It was learned that the BSF used to restrict Bangladeshi nationals from using the river. Mohiuddin, a former member of Jadavpur union parishad, recounted that there was a time when the locals used to net fish in the river. When the people moved away from the bordering neighbourhood due to their inconvenience, the BSF established their control over the river, though it falls within the Bangladeshi territory. 

“Farmers were prevented from farming in adjacent land and netting fish in the river. Whenever locals tried to use the river, the BSF would intervene, leading to altercations sometimes,” he noted. 

Upon learning about the issue, the 58-BGB battalion verified the border through official documents, local administration, and maps, and lodged a strong protest against the BSF’s illegal dominance. They eventually managed to reclaim control over the 4.8-kilometer stretch and deployed additional forces along the border, along with mechanised boats and all-terrain vehicles.

On Monday, Lt Col Shah Md Azizus Shahid, commanding officer of the 58-BGB battalion, exchanged views with locals and informed them that they can now freely use the river. He thanked the locals for their cooperation with the BGB and urged them to keep the young generation well-informed about the position of the border. 

Also See: Bangladesh’s Evolving Foreign Relations in South Asia

Protest from the BSF

Indian media outlets, including PTI and Anandabazar Patrika, disputed the BGB claim and cited the BSF to term the move as ‘irresponsible’. The reports noted that the 5-km area is considered as Indian territory under the border agreement of 1975, and that there have been longstanding disputes over its control. 

In response, the BGB commanding officer said, “The Indian media reports came to our attention. They are spreading lies. We have not received any written or verbal objections from either BSF battalion commander or company commander regarding my press briefing.” 

This news is sourced from Bangladesh Daily Prothom Alo and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »