Bangladesh bans BCL, student wing of Sheikh Hasina’s party

Bangladesh bans the BCL as a terrorist organization amid escalating student protests and unrest, citing a history of violence.

Bangladesh’s interim government has officially banned the Bangladesh Chhatra League (BCL), the student wing of ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League party, declaring it a “terrorist organisation”.

This move responds to escalating demands from the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement. The movement outlined five key demands. These include the abolishment of the current constitution, the removal of President Mohammed Shahabuddin, and the dissolution of the BCL.

The Ministry of Home Affairs cited the BCL’s history of serious misconduct over the past 15 years, including violence, harassment, and exploitation of public resources. The ban under the Anti-Terrorism Act takes effect immediately, it said in a gazette notification issued late on Wednesday.

The country has seen rising tensions and protests in recent months, after violent protests forced Hasina to flee to India on Aug. 5 and an interim government led by Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus took charge.

Escalating Unrest in Bangladesh

The protests began as a student-led movement against public sector job quotas in July. They escalated into some of the deadliest unrest since the country’s independence in 1971. This unrest resulted in over 700 deaths and numerous injuries.

During the unrest, BCL leaders and activists attacked protesting students and the general public with arms. They killed hundreds of innocent people and endangered the lives of many more, the statement added.

There was no comments from the party while many senior Awami League leaders have either been arrested on accusations of having roles in the unrest or have gone into hiding.

Founded in 1948, the BCL has historically been a significant faction within the Awami League.

Previously, Hasina’s government banned the country’s main Islamic party, the Jamaat-e-Islami, and its affiliated groups under the anti-terrorism law. The government blamed Jamaat-e-Islami for stoking deadly violence during student-led protests. It also accused the party of involvement in alleged terrorist activities linked to their actions against the country during the 1971 independence war.

However, the interim government has since lifted this ban following the fall of Hasina’s government.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »