‘Anarchy if interim govt fails,’ says Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir

Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir discusses Bangladesh's political future, election reforms, and challenges under the interim government. [Image via Benar News]

After being in the political wilderness for 15 years, Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir is a man in a hurry to see his political party, the largest one in Bangladesh, potentially return to power.

Fakhrul, Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) secretary-general, wants the interim government that was installed after then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina fled the country to speed up the reforms required to hold free and fair elections.

Many political analysts say the BNP very likely will be elected.  Before Hasina’s decade-and-a-half at the helm, Bangladesh twice alternated between voting for her Awami League and the BNP. 

Bangladesh’s Political Shift

Hasina left for India after a student protest against job quotas became a mass movement demanding she resign because security forces fired on protesters. More than 800 people died during these movements. 

After she ran away, an interim administration backed by university students who led the mass movement, civil society members and parties except the Awami League, has been at the helm of affairs in the South Asian nation for a little over 100 days.

Muhammad Yunus (center), gestures as he inspects the ravaged former official Dhaka residence of ex-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina [AFP]
Muhammad Yunus (center), gestures as he inspects the ravaged former official Dhaka residence of ex-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina [AFP]

The mandate of this administration led by 2006 Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus is to make the country and the state apparatus ready to hold an impartial and democratic general election.

Hasina and her Awami League had governed Bangladesh since 2009, winning four consecutive elections, including two boycotted by the BNP and its allies in 2014 and January 2024, and one widely criticized as rigged in 2018.

Many of Fakhrul’s BNP colleagues are impatient and clamoring for swift elections, but he said three months is nearly not enough time to repair the damage done to state institutions during 15 years of Hasina’s rule.

And repairing many of those institutions is an essential prerequisite for a truly democratic national election.

Interview

Fakhrul recently sat down with BenarNews for 30 minutes to discuss the future election and reasons for the continued lawlessness in Bangladesh, among other issues.

Excerpts from the interview, which has been edited for length and clarity:

Performance of Interim Government

BenarNews: What do you expect most from the interim government and has it performed to your satisfaction?

Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir: The biggest expectation is that it will complete the [necessary] reforms expeditiously and hold an impartial, free election acceptable to all. 

During the last 15 years, Hasina and her party destroyed Bangladesh politically, economically and socially.

Considering all this, the interim government has moved to constitute an Election Commission, formed a search committee and sought names. 

They have started the work. That work will be complete soon.

Protesters clash with Border Guard Bangladesh and police, during anti-quota protests by students [Reuters]
Protesters clash with Border Guard Bangladesh and police, during anti-quota protests by students [Reuters]

BN: You have said many times that the BNP wants to give the interim government “logical time.” How do you define this?  

MFIA: By “logical time,” I mean the time by when the election commission can become a completely impartial body so that an unhindered, fair and impartial election can be held. 

BN: You say the constitution needs amending. Why?

MFIA: The Awami League government destroyed the [original] 1972 constitution and made it a charter of fascism. So its reform is a crying need. Otherwise, nothing can be fixed.

BN: The BNP has been repeating that this interim government should not fail. Why?

MFIA: The consequences [of it failing] may be dangerous. The [Awami League] fascists may come back. Anarchy may follow … which is not desirable for anyone.

Lawlessness after Sheikh Hasina

BN: After Hasina fled, street protests have been held over trifling issues, officials were forced to resign and some beaten up. Why is there still so much lawlessness?

MFIA: That is because Bangladesh has not experienced true democratic practices. They did not dare to speak out. Now they can, and are doing so freely. 

Additionally, Awami League supporters are causing mischief on the online instructions from India by Hasina.

Then-Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina addresses the media after her visit to a Dhaka hospital [AFP]
Then-Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina addresses the media after her visit to a Dhaka hospital [AFP]

Attacks on Minority Communities

BN: There is uproar in the international media that minority communities such as Hindus were attacked after Hasina fell and continue to be under threat in this Muslim-majority country. Is this happening, and if so, why?

Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir:  Let me make this clear:

In three districts in southeastern Bangladesh, Hindu idols were vandalized. It was proven that the Awami League’s student wing was behind the attacks, but the government took no action. 

And there was no uproar in the international media.

There were some problems immediately after the political change. But they were not communal. They were political.

Take the case of Hasina. She is a Muslim and she fled. The house of Hasina’s Muslim adviser was looted.

Why? They were Awami Leaguers. People have massive hate for the Awami League.

The Awami League wants to make it an issue that the BNP or Bangladesh is persecuting minorities.

Hindu devotees while observing the Rakher Upobash festival at a temple in Dhaka [Reuters]
Hindu devotees while observing the Rakher Upobash festival at a temple in Dhaka [Reuters]

Return of Militancy

BN: Similarly, the Awami League and others allege that militancy will return if the BNP comes to power. What’s your response?

MFIA: We have not supported militancy. We will not support militancy –  zero tolerance.

The Awami League manufactures these stories. Yes, you can say that there is a move toward fundamentalism. And the Awami League is responsible for that.

They blocked the path of democracy, and when you do that, fundamentalism is sure to flourish.

We were the first government to arrest all militants.

Advice to Political Parties

BN: As you wait for the election to be announced, what advice do you have for political parties including BNP?

Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir: I have only one. All of us must be patriots, must work for the people’s welfare and not abuse power if in government.

We believe the BNP will in no way repeat the Awami League’s mistakes. If we do, we will have to face the same consequences it did.

This news is sourced from Benar News and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »