After two high-level engagements, Nepal and India look for a boundary meeting

After two back-to-back high-level engagements between Nepal and India in the recent past, the two neighbors are now looking to hold a meeting.

Officials familiar with the development say the meeting will be held “very soon”. The move is significant as the two countries are still in boundary disputes.

Similarly, Nepal has proposed the meeting either in the last week of August or in September. Said two officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Department of Survey.They are awaiting India’s response, they further added.

The Boundary Working Group 

A joint agency constituted by the governments of Nepal and India. Formed in 2014, it was to carry out construction, restoration and repair works of boundary pillars, clearing ‘no-man’s land’ and other tasks of the sort.

The Group so far has had six meetings.The last meeting was in August last year in Dehradun, India.

Susta and Kalpani disputes

Tensions flared up in early May after the Indian defence minister inaugurated a road link via Lipulekh to Kailash Mansarovar in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. In response, Nepal published its political map depicting Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura within its territories.

Even though the group does not look into the disputes. It will provide technical inputs to higher-ups. The foreign secretary-level mechanism is tasked with resolving the disputes concerning Susta and Kalapani.

However, no meeting transpired despite both sides expressing willingness. Experts say engagements between the two countries are always welcome.  Exchanges almost always aid in de-escalating tensions.

Further statements

“A telephonic conversation took plave between the prime ministers of the two countries.tThe high-level meeting between our foreign secretary and Indian ambassador helped break the ice.” said Madhuraman Acharya, former foreign secretary and ambassador.

“We can hope for bilateral engagements in the coming days.” No diplomatic dialogue between Nepal and India took place since November. After Delhi published a new map marking Kalapani within India.

“Both sides are exchanging correspondence to fix the date,” Damodar Dhakal, spokesperson for the Department of Survey, told the Kathmandu Post. “Although this time the meeting should take place in Nepal. Owing to the pandemic. It is likely to be a virtual meeting.” He added.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »