After two high-level engagements, Nepal and India look for a boundary meeting

After two back-to-back high-level engagements between Nepal and India in the recent past, the two neighbors are now looking to hold a meeting.

Officials familiar with the development say the meeting will be held “very soon”. The move is significant as the two countries are still in boundary disputes.

Similarly, Nepal has proposed the meeting either in the last week of August or in September. Said two officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Department of Survey.They are awaiting India’s response, they further added.

The Boundary Working Group 

A joint agency constituted by the governments of Nepal and India. Formed in 2014, it was to carry out construction, restoration and repair works of boundary pillars, clearing ‘no-man’s land’ and other tasks of the sort.

The Group so far has had six meetings.The last meeting was in August last year in Dehradun, India.

Susta and Kalpani disputes

Tensions flared up in early May after the Indian defence minister inaugurated a road link via Lipulekh to Kailash Mansarovar in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. In response, Nepal published its political map depicting Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura within its territories.

Even though the group does not look into the disputes. It will provide technical inputs to higher-ups. The foreign secretary-level mechanism is tasked with resolving the disputes concerning Susta and Kalapani.

However, no meeting transpired despite both sides expressing willingness. Experts say engagements between the two countries are always welcome.  Exchanges almost always aid in de-escalating tensions.

Further statements

“A telephonic conversation took plave between the prime ministers of the two countries.tThe high-level meeting between our foreign secretary and Indian ambassador helped break the ice.” said Madhuraman Acharya, former foreign secretary and ambassador.

“We can hope for bilateral engagements in the coming days.” No diplomatic dialogue between Nepal and India took place since November. After Delhi published a new map marking Kalapani within India.

“Both sides are exchanging correspondence to fix the date,” Damodar Dhakal, spokesperson for the Department of Survey, told the Kathmandu Post. “Although this time the meeting should take place in Nepal. Owing to the pandemic. It is likely to be a virtual meeting.” He added.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »