After Babri Masjid Ajmer Sharif Becomes BJP’s New Target

Tensions rise as Ajmer Sharif faces legal claims, echoing the Babri Masjid dispute and targeting Muslim heritage sites. [Image via SAT Creatives]

Following the contentious demolition of the Babri Masjid, the revered Ajmer Sharif Dargah has become the latest target in a series of actions reflecting the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) Hindutva-driven agenda. A recent petition filed in a local court claimed that a Shiva temple exists within the dargah premises of the Sufi saint Moinuddin Chishti, sparking a wave of outrage among India’s Muslim community.

The court in Ajmer subsequently issued notices to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the central government, escalating tensions surrounding the sanctity of one of India’s most prominent Muslim heritage sites. The Supreme Court of India has intervened, temporarily halting any actions until further orders.

A Pattern of Targeting Muslim Heritage Sites

The claim over Ajmer Sharif is not an isolated incident. It forms part of a larger trend that includes efforts to alter the narratives surrounding Muslim heritage sites in India. Since the BJP’s rise to power in 2014 under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, there has been a surge in attempts to reclaim lands perceived as Hindu religious spaces.

The tensions surrounding Ajmer Sharif echo the painful memories of the Babri Masjid demolition, where similar claims over religious ownership ignited nationwide unrest.

The most prominent example is the Babri Masjid case, where the Supreme Court allowed the construction of a Ram Temple on the disputed site in Ayodhya. Similar petitions have emerged concerning the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and other heritage sites, creating a climate of unease among India’s Muslim population.

Also See: Hindutva: A Civilisational Gerrymandering of India

Bulldozer Justice and Legislative Maneuvers

Muslim communities across India have faced heightened oppression through a combination of legislative amendments and enforcement actions. The Waqf Amendment Bill, for instance, has raised alarms over its potential to strip Muslim trusts of their properties. Simultaneously, widespread anti-encroachment drives, often referred to as “bulldozer justice,” have disproportionately targeted Muslim-owned properties under the guise of urban development.

The Gujarat government recently sanctioned the demolition of a 1,200-year-old mosque, citing land-use violations. Critics argue that these actions are aimed at erasing Muslim identity and heritage under the guise of modernization and legal compliance.

Citizenship Laws and the Marginalization of Muslims

The passage of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) further compound the plight of Muslims in India. These measures have been criticized for disproportionately excluding Muslims, particularly in Assam, where nearly two million people—mostly Muslims—face the risk of statelessness.

Hate Speech and Media Amplification

The role of pro-BJP media outlets in amplifying divisive narratives cannot be overlooked. Coverage often frames Muslims as threats to national unity, normalizing discrimination and violence. The escalation of extremist slogans and attacks on places of worship has fostered an environment of fear and exclusion.

Global Condemnation and Calls for Action

India’s deteriorating human rights situation has attracted international scrutiny. The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and other global bodies have raised concerns about the targeting of religious minorities and the erosion of India’s secular fabric.

Ajmer Sharif, a symbol of interfaith harmony, is now at the center of this contentious struggle. The ongoing judicial interventions may provide a temporary respite, but the broader agenda of erasing Muslim heritage sites signals a deeper challenge to India’s pluralistic identity.

The international community must hold the Indian government accountable for preserving religious diversity and preventing further descent into authoritarianism. The battle for Ajmer Sharif is not just about a site; it is about the future of coexistence in one of the world’s most diverse nations.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Herat tragedy claims 30 lives, exposing Afghanistan’s governance failures, unsafe migration, and escalating humanitarian crisis.

Herat Border Tragedy: The Deadly Consequences of Afghanistan’s Governance Failures

The Herat border tragedy, is a stark illustration of the human cost of Afghanistan’s governance failures. With limited economic opportunities, widespread poverty, and insufficient social support, families are forced to undertake life-threatening journeys across freezing mountains. The incident underscores the urgent need for the Afghan government to provide stable livelihoods, establish safe migration routes, and strengthen healthcare and social services, as humanitarian risks continue to escalate across the country.

Read More »
A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »