Afghanistan Urges UNAMA to Enhance Global Ties As UN Extends Mission

UNAMA’s mission in Afghanistan extended for a year as the UN urges engagement, while Pakistan criticizes Taliban on terrorism. [Image via Tolo News]

The Islamic Emirate, following the one-year extension of UNAMA’s mission in the recent UN Security Council meeting, has called on the UN representation in Afghanistan to work towards facilitating the country’s global interactions.

Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate, reiterated this request while also rejecting claims of threats emanating from Afghanistan toward neighboring countries.

He stated: “This representation should pursue its main objective. Instead of creating unnecessary concerns in the country and exploiting minor issues, they should not provide grounds for propaganda against Afghanistan or become a tool of malicious circles.”

Also See: UNSC To Vote On Extending UNAMA’s Afghanistan Mission

The UN Security Council, after a month of deliberations, unanimously approved the resolution on UNAMA’s mission extension on Monday.

The one-year mission will focus on humanitarian conditions, economic matters, international aid, human rights, and fostering engagements.

Fu Cong, China’s permanent representative to the UN, emphasized: “This resolution reaffirms strong commitments to Afghanistan’s sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and national unity. It reflects the Council’s positions, expectations, and concerns regarding Afghanistan’s evolving challenges. The resolution also highlights Afghanistan’s economic difficulties, humanitarian funding shortages, and obstacles to international aid.”

Several UNSC members, including the UK, South Korea, and the US, stressed UNAMA’s focus on human rights in Afghanistan, particularly women’s rights.

The Russian representative emphasized pragmatic engagement and Afghanistan’s reintegration into the international community as key to lasting peace.

Anna Evstigneeva, deputy permanent representative of Russia to the UN, stated: “We are convinced that achieving lasting peace in Afghanistan is impossible without a comprehensive and realistic approach toward its final international reintegration. This approach must be based on objective assessments and patient dialogue with the de facto authorities, including under UN supervision.”

Dorothy Shea, the US representative at the UN, said: “We call on UNAMA to strengthen its efforts to promote Afghans in enjoyment of human rights, particularly for women and girls. We support UNAMA’s work to help address the widespread humanitarian crisis and stabilize the economy.” 

Pakistan’s representative, however, once again criticized Afghanistan’s interim government regarding terrorism.

Munir Akram, Pakistan’s permanent representative to the UN, stated: “Apart from the need for adequate humanitarian assistance to destitute Afghans, Pakistan has consistently asserted that the foremost amount the challenges faced in Afghanistan is terrorism within and from Afghanistan. The Taliban government has not been effective in eliminating ISIS, Daesh. It has tolerated several other terrorist groups and is complicit in the cross-border attacks.”

UNAMA’s mission has been extended in Afghanistan until March 17, 2026.

This news is sourced from Tolo News and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »