Afghan Refugees in U.S. Given Seven-Day Notice to Depart

U.S. gives Afghan refugees with TPS a seven-day deadline to leave, sparking concerns over safety amid ongoing crisis. [Image via Khaama Press]

Afghan refugees in the U.S. have been given a seven-day notice to leave, according to the Afghan Evac president.

Shawn VanDiver, president of Afghan Evac—a U.S.-based organization supporting Afghan refugees—has stated that the U.S. government has given Afghan refugees with Temporary Protected Status (TPS) a seven-day deadline to leave the country.

According to VanDiver, a number of Afghan refugees in the United States have already received official notices from the government ordering them to depart.

He has urged Afghan refugees not to leave the country without first consulting with their legal counsel.

Also See: Visa Overstay Leads to Arrest of Afghan Student in Pune, India

U.S. media reported on Thursday, April 17, that some Afghan refugees received an email from the Department of Homeland Security giving them a one-week deadline to leave the country. The email warned that failure to comply would lead to federal arrest.

This development follows earlier reports by U.S. media quoting Tricia McLaughlin, spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, who confirmed that the Trump administration has revoked Temporary Protected Status for 14,600 Afghan nationals in the United States.

According to these reports, the affected individuals now face the risk of deportation by May 2025.

McLaughlin stated that Kristi Noem, the new Secretary of Homeland Security, has determined that the current conditions in Afghanistan no longer meet the criteria for granting protected status.

The U.S. TPS program is intended for individuals from countries experiencing natural disasters, armed conflict, or extraordinary circumstances. Termination of this status could place thousands at risk of removal, despite ongoing instability in their home country.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post has reported that the order to deport Afghan migrants has been issued at an inappropriate time, criticizing the decision. The newspaper emphasizes that this policy comes when Afghanistan is still facing severe instability and humanitarian challenges.

The report further highlights that deporting Afghan migrants, many of whom have fled violence and insecurity, could exacerbate the already dire situation in the country. Critics argue that such a decision disregards the ongoing humanitarian crisis and the need for continued international support for those affected.

Human rights advocates have warned that forcibly sending Afghan refugees back amid continued humanitarian and security crises violates international protection norms. Many of these individuals fled persecution and may face serious threats if returned.

Legal and humanitarian organizations are calling on the U.S. government to reconsider the decision, urging renewed assessments of conditions in Afghanistan and the reestablishment of protected legal pathways for vulnerable individuals.

This news is sourced from Khaama Press and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »