Failures of Police Assistance Mission Led by the US in Afghanistan

 

The detailed report of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) on the “Lessons Learned” pinpoints and analyzes in depth the failures and the causes of failures of the US in Afghanistan. The report dissects the problems and the consequent inability of the US and the allies to build an independent Afghan National Defense and Security Force (ANDSF). In addition to this, the report also brings to light the incompetence of the Police Assistance Mission to deliver and to raise an Afghan National Police (ANP) capable of delivering the policing functions and maintaining law and order.

The report finds the militarization of the police force as the major and the central problem which defied and derailed the ANP from cracking down on criminal activities and protecting civilians. As a result of the militarization, ANP’s role started to overlap with that of the security forces and police personnel actively took part in counter-insurgency adopting a fighter’s posture instead of a police man. This also furthered a brutal image of this police force. The same report also blames the historical factors for the failure of the ANP, highlighting that the country never had an “effective nationwide police force.”

As for the Police Assistance Mission, the police advisors remained in a state of confusion and dilemma: “whether to partner with corrupt and abusive yet military effective police officials supported by key portions of local population or refuse and risk rising instability, loss of support for U.S. intervention, and reduction of U.S. ability to target and disrupt terrorist cells.” Owing to these ground realities, despite making an investment of 20 years’ time and 21 Billion Dollars, the US could not build an Afghan National Police that could survive after the withdrawal of the US.

Bulletin

Bulletin

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Pakistan completes repayment of $3.45 billion to UAE

The End of Patient Capital: How Pakistan’s Balance Sheet Became a Battlefield

The April 2026 fluctuations in Pakistan’s foreign reserves mark the definitive end of “patient capital” in Gulf diplomacy. As the UAE withdrew $3.45 billion and Saudi Arabia countered with a multi-year extension, the sovereign deposit was transformed from a neutral financial tool into a binary political referendum. Pakistan’s balance sheet now serves as a live map of regional realignment, proving that in the new Middle East, strategic neutrality carries a precise fiscal value.

Read More »
Durand Line – A Binding International Border

The Myth of the Disputed Line: Why Afghan Pragmatism is Finally Overturning Populist Rhetoric

A transformative shift is emerging in Afghan political discourse as leaders like Mohammad Tahir Zuhair and the National Resistance Front (NRF) move toward formal recognition of the Durand Line. By prioritizing “historical realism” over populist rhetoric, these voices suggest that nearly 80% of Afghans seek peace and trade over territorial disputes. This shift offers a rare opportunity to transition Pak-Afghan relations from decades of suspicion to a strategic partnership rooted in internationally recognized boundaries. A transformative shift is emerging in Afghan political discourse as leaders like Mohammad Tahir Zuhair and the National Resistance Front (NRF) move toward formal recognition of the Durand Line. By prioritizing “historical realism” over populist rhetoric, these voices suggest that nearly 80% of Afghans seek peace and trade over territorial disputes. This shift offers a rare opportunity to transition Pak-Afghan relations from decades of suspicion to a strategic partnership rooted in internationally recognized boundaries.

Read More »