“Unite for Peace” Call by HCNR Head Abdullah Abdullah

The decades-long war in Afghanistan has caused its people frustration. It is also the reason behind the division between the people and their leaders. Only recently, a top official calls to stop this nuisance. That top official is none other than Head of High Council for National Reconciliation, Abdullah Abdullah. He is currently heading the negotiations between the Afghan Government and the Afghan Taliban.

Abdullah Abdullah Calling for Unity

His statement comes at a time where it not only sends a good message but also leaves a question. A question of whether the Afghan government is still divided and strong enough to sustain the post-withdrawal effect. His words are directed towards those stakeholders and warlords who hold strong power in Afghanistan. Abdullah Abdullah himself knows their mindset as he was once deputy to Ahmed Shah Masood, the famous warlord from the north who fought against the Taliban after they took over Kabul in 1996.

The politics of Afghanistan is as corrupt as it is. Subsequently, when politicians all are on the same table, their personal interest still divides them.

During his interview, Abdullah unveiled that the process of withdrawal has started.  The previous date for the withdrawal was 1st May 2021. This was decided according to the February Peace Agreement. However, after Biden took office earlier this year, the dates changed. The new extended date for the withdrawal is 11th September. There are approximately 2,500 to 3,500 US soldiers and 7,000 NATO soldiers in Afghanistan.

Afghan Unity for Post-Withdrawal Peace is Important

Abdullah motivated the people of Afghanistan by saying that he negates the statements and analysis that are calling this withdrawal an end to Afghanistan. However, he did accept the fact that after withdrawal, it will be a tough time handling the situation. The Taliban still control a large part of Afghanistan and have an experienced, well-equipped army. As international forces withdraw, the Kabul government will have little to cash their demands on.

Another reason why he called for unity is that he fears that the Taliban might back out of the deal after the withdrawal. He informed that he has doubts regarding the Taliban’s promise to the peace deal. He further said the Taliban, though, has been replying to countless calls by his Council, their replies are usually informal, saying that ‘they are sometimes details or sometimes brief’. His expression shows that things are still unclear and might remain unclear well after the withdrawal. Surprisingly, he claimed that terrorists cannot win militarily and even claimed that the foreign nations supporting the Taliban are now not in favour of the Taliban taking over.

Nonetheless, whatever he said, it clearly means that Kabul still fears the Taliban and more than that it fears the internal division that has weakened the government. Several developments are taking place to solve the issues in Afghanistan. However, despite all that, can we expect the Taliban to overrun the formal government in Kabul and revive 1996? Can’t say anything about that but in turn of events, al-Qaeda has thrown its support behind the Taliban.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »